IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Working Group Administrivia

Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com> Sun, 07 December 2014 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <mpetach@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE101A8976 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 13:29:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0x-1P20nizzX for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 13:29:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com (mail-wg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BB2D1A8978 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 13:29:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id x12so2282809wgg.25 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 13:29:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=scCr1c2NDRArwgDOPKjz5Jj9PABZ+hncYNdZoObIeXM=; b=wyM+ozaU9hicSaI17kFRv8O6rSdajPquxc3MWave69DqOkkfYiY6CG+gGVF+Kg6xd+ e4NeXShvjf657RzbHcg/JmT4AW+ZJGYFyI1I4CXAdv2vqLv/TKF7PpKHy64J9W8s/y7u nv5qDZfgGA0FN/z/5jOs6P21qST0SM6odI6+qCgafeWwUSWJ81P6p6Y31ps/HT5Re/vt UBp1TozVW057OPcRYR5MvkUEydXJNuJFbFQqgRAA7+n1++VBCR9j9KZr7hBtDlLUO7MO VHA1q2UHiZ8g/C4Vdu2l9YdHVPXXnQ3u3L6gruijy0ZRuNO2Pb2fDweX6brLvOezWavX iJyA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.90.206 with SMTP id by14mr19626161wib.67.1417987749241; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 13:29:09 -0800 (PST)
Sender: mpetach@gmail.com
Received: by 10.27.89.1 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 13:29:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <010701d01204$b8e18160$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <08DA982D-6605-434B-B815-C69B8A97FA4C@cisco.com> <010701d01204$b8e18160$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 13:29:09 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Knm57VvPJ5Yc4_TwLLQNMnN4MBo
Message-ID: <CAEmG1=qpU5gS50rj5O4TfEh+dS8FmMRVzQAyG=nM5s=SujpyGg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com>
To: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d043c80ec16e8810509a7002c"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Byn85ErxVAD2JGfj0E4rqnbqIw8
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Working Group Administrivia
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 21:29:13 -0000

On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 2:01 AM, t.petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> wrote:

> Fred
>
> As Brian says in his note,
>
> 2014-10-27           draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem/
>
> addresses a known problem and I think it would be remiss of the IETF not
> to have this documented
>
> Tom Petch
>


Completely concur; we can't leave the
current situation as it is, where the
behaviours are decided ad-hoc by
different sets of developers, and
upgrading your OS may suddenly
change how your network behaves.
This needs to be documented, and
hopefully fixed at some point.

Thanks!

Matt

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status