IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Working Group Administrivia

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Tue, 09 December 2014 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937391A0318 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 13:50:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.231
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.231 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SsXPUNQIui18 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 13:50:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82D3A1A0092 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 13:50:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost.ecs.soton.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sB9Lo5fp016794; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:50:05 GMT
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk sB9Lo5fp016794
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=201304; t=1418161805; bh=P+cvcfkkT/321wEJ00DSEhxm2LA=; h=Subject:Mime-Version:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=NZyTmCflrx413vHteFklRy/4tzVnbUtJWDEbWKW26VMljia/AyAGwHMvg4yhksiwa nO436XE6axrF2nVI+u1KWnOTAPnToHK5PV0YTOdDJRrF18/u8ZyrjmuUlSvkXheU80 NxFiL6Qw8ujRrn1l3lWjruYp6CXkXOrgXMjfNbdU=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk ([2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:401]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:68da]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id qB8Lo52688710801rN ret-id none; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 21:50:05 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.108] (host213-123-213-183.in-addr.btopenworld.com [213.123.213.183]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sB9Lngi0020717 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:49:43 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9A6CD5A5-0629-4200-ACFF-57A73BE42AF7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b3
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <154FBC4D-2FCE-4AC0-9881-3CB34924B6ED@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 21:49:41 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|e65f771293c70608c1e809b43d881656qB8Lo503tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|5D2CD422-3911-407B-9D71-2753A996CE5B@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <08DA982D-6605-434B-B815-C69B8A97FA4C@cisco.com> <154FBC4D-2FCE-4AC0-9881-3CB34924B6ED@cisco.com> <5D2CD422-3911-407B-9D71-2753A996CE5B@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=qB8Lo5268871080100; tid=qB8Lo52688710801rN; client=relay,forged,no_ptr,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=2:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: sB9Lo5fp016794
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/HlMLK5uk7apvgMRYS32MGcd_1yo
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Working Group Administrivia
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 21:50:38 -0000

Hi,

> On 9 Dec 2014, at 15:33, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> So what I get out of this so far is that folks are OK with the clean-up of the expired drafts, but feel that there is a place for a WG document documenting (but not making recommendations about) the SLAAC/DHCP problem.

I would like to see these that one progressed, as it came out of the 6renum WG as a gap, and it would be very appropriate to close that gap off, as best as we can.

> Let me ask specifically about the “ULA” and “Design Choices” documents. They have not expired and their authors are still working on them. Brian has commented; others have not. Do we want to keep working on them?

I think both are useful. There were certainly other documents that ‘punted’ guidance on ULA usage to that ULA draft, so it would seem reasonable to complete it, so long as its just Informational and not BCP. And I’ve seen references to the design choices document in various places, so people are clearly using it, and finding it useful to point others at, so again closing it off would seem worthwhile.

The old enterprise IPv6 draft of mine you dug up was of course obsoleted by the enterprise-incremental document, so is certainly dead.

Tim

> 
> On Dec 5, 2014, at 10:17 AM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>> Although the working group expressed interest in the following and the authors have been working hard on them, we think the working group is no longer interested in these, and so they should be returned to the authors and not recorded or treated as working group drafts.
>> 
>> 2014-09-18                 draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices      http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices/
>> 2014-10-27           draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem      http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem/
>> 2014-10-27      draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations      http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status