IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-townsley-troan-ipv6-ce-transitioning-00.txt

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Mon, 19 December 2011 10:56 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358F821F8B51 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 02:56:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t78rONPgBYoQ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 02:56:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750E321F8B4A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 02:56:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90A6F8955 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:56:25 +0100 (CET)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3AC4F893D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:56:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: (qmail 45645 invoked by uid 1007); 19 Dec 2011 11:56:25 +0100
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:56:25 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Wuyts Carl <Carl.Wuyts@technicolor.com>
Message-ID: <20111219105625.GZ72014@Space.Net>
References: <20111207140615.6706.64255.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4EE7FA27.2030409@gmail.com> <25C02113-D448-4B3F-A9C8-CDCF9B5D612B@employees.org> <20111214100624.GF72014@Space.Net> <68CE9775-BCC1-48D8-A777-374352E0A45C@employees.org> <867F4B6A1672E541A94676D556793ACD0CB44B2651@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EI1INYmCmoCyddgn"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <867F4B6A1672E541A94676D556793ACD0CB44B2651@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: "draft-townsley-troan-ipv6-ce-transitioning@tools.ietf.org" <draft-townsley-troan-ipv6-ce-transitioning@tools.ietf.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-townsley-troan-ipv6-ce-transitioning-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:56:30 -0000

Hi,

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 08:39:23AM +0100, Wuyts Carl wrote:
> Small Q: so you consider "BFD-support" to be mandatory on the CPE ?

Well, I'd love to see BFD supported, but given that the PE usually doesn't
properly support BFD for large-scale deployments either, I'm not putting
much hopes into it.

Regarding Ole's proposal - that's "operating like BFD in echo mode", but
(I think) it is not BFD-as-a-protocol, just the way it works.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email