IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IA_PD bit in RA

sthaug@nethelp.no Sat, 14 December 2013 06:56 UTC

Return-Path: <sthaug@nethelp.no>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D941AE146 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:56:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2x1U9vL5arcs for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:56:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EDE541AE4EB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:56:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 65689 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2013 06:56:28 -0000
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (HELO localhost) (195.1.209.33) by bizet.nethelp.no with SMTP; 14 Dec 2013 06:56:28 -0000
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 07:56:28 +0100
Message-Id: <20131214.075628.74686573.sthaug@nethelp.no>
To: alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <52AB8CA6.9030402@gmail.com>
References: <52AB7BB6.2080002@gmail.com> <8FD5ECFA-A4E6-484D-8A5C-F8C6BC1AEDCC@delong.com> <52AB8CA6.9030402@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IA_PD bit in RA
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 06:56:42 -0000

> In addition to Radius and PPP, there are the migration v4-v6 mechanisms 
> which may offer a v6 Delegated Prefix as well.
> 
> > nor do I think I would expect there to be support for this in RA.
> 
> But one _would_ expect RA to always be there.

Not necessarily. Some of us would like to use DHCPv6 for this, and
be rid of RA. Yes, I'm very much aware that this isn't supported
today,

Steinar Haug, AS 2116

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email