IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] RFC7084

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Thu, 12 December 2013 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@Space.Net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE0D1AE404 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:59:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hUUgL7VnvEjl for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:59:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B961AE1E8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:59:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC2463C3A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 20:59:34 +0100 (CET)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A4C963C34 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 20:59:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: (qmail 85998 invoked by uid 1007); 12 Dec 2013 20:59:34 +0100
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 20:59:34 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Message-ID: <20131212195934.GR81676@Space.Net>
References: <7B4820C5-B562-4BE7-8C6A-CBCDABC39728@nominum.com> <A583EFC3-71BB-4962-875C-4AB775D13491@delong.com> <46BE373C-D476-4D83-B014-56B77FD3D67E@nominum.com> <39280481-09C5-41ED-B79E-99DBBD329F44@employees.org> <52A8343C.3040202@gmail.com> <CAAedzxq6ym-uZJQVC7JTMgKnETpGiNt3JCmkJeGW2MVnw+sixA@mail.gmail.com> <52A83C92.4020204@gmail.com> <A1A3DD00-96D8-4D73-B5F1-1CA705196689@delong.com> <52A9A93F.8050804@gmail.com> <9CB9D172-BA78-492B-B836-D7A9C6CB11A5@delong.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9CB9D172-BA78-492B-B836-D7A9C6CB11A5@delong.com>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Spmfilter-Virus-Scanned: OK
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] RFC7084
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 19:59:44 -0000

Hi,

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:05:47AM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Nobody has yet made a good case for why this behavior is problematic.

We can't do it that way, because we don't do that in IPv4!!  Can't you
see?  And with DHCP-PD, we can't do NAT!

No, this wasn't a serious or useful statement, but half of the discussion
wasn't either.  Just to reinforce that.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email