IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RE: Agenda call

Chen Gang <phdgang@gmail.com> Sat, 10 October 2009 01:58 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59773A67A5 for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 18:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.31
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.184, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x5DRaP-tiurR for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 18:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A408F3A672E for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 18:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1MwRA5-000K4a-MU for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:54:21 +0000
Received: from [209.85.222.198] (helo=mail-pz0-f198.google.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <phdgang@gmail.com>) id 1MwR9v-000K3s-EC for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:54:19 +0000
Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so4598676pzk.5 for <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dNQdDowumbfztn5ZooyZjRG/9kyc+w5SCDmG8HuIvJ8=; b=tERvTZhnNt4ad4MkxZTvh7dsOjvthg7m0o2GYUJk9hrmAAmsoWg0R1Gg7AjMDAWyVE qpzrxY5na2qMe0KkVW8bWFHZv5/KLPohOqzKdpEUyfpNxcGfaLCcrrnToytDOHEwzbme rcLGOUS5eSxU6LXesp/+FM+2AemntJsWabGaU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=BJBwCFZiyFfQ6buvhsWg0b43UzuQmUDOpVzFNYOAiebGo8lJ443+Ir0N8lJusUNb2X nhOxbkSww7xoDVa4QpLFPfli1CY+vs6/3xvtEoaGX04frq0n+6K8UOd5dp8NmswtP7JF kq/XrHd1BwM18aeKivRm8asr6UmrniizpvscU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.152.26 with SMTP id z26mr275338wfd.324.1255139650867; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20091009051358.33DD130B0972@mail.jzland.com>
References: <20091009051358.33DD130B0972@mail.jzland.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 09:54:10 +0800
Message-ID: <36ba02b00910091854ia395f26v99f47ad4b067691c@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RE: Agenda call
From: Chen Gang <phdgang@gmail.com>
To: Yong <yong@csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn>
Cc: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd2de1208910804758af95f"
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

CGN is a important approach for IPv6 transition and has numerous use cases
in current network deployment. I also think it should be approved as a wg
item.

Gang
chengang@chinamobile.com



2009/10/9 Yong <yong@csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn>

> I also agree to accept this I-D as WG document bacause I believe
> dual-stack or IPv6-only ISP networks should be important parts
> during the IPv4/IPv6 coexistence.
>
>
> -Yong
> yong@csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn
>
>
> ======= 2009-10-08 23:23:34 You wrote =======
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Fred Baker
> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 6:21 PM
> >> To: IPv6 Operations
> >> Subject: Re: Agenda call
> >>
> >> The authors wanted to ask about this at the last IETF meeting, and the
> >> discussion around the document told me that it wasn't ready for
> >> working group status.
> >>
> >> Opinions at this point? Does this document represent something the
> >> working group wants to take on?
> >
> >I reviewed the document, and IMHO it is stable enough
> >and relevant enough to take on as a wg item.
> >
> >Fred
> >fred.l.templin@boeing.com
> >
> >> On Oct 7, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> >>
> >> > I'm not sure if Sheng is back on line, so let me say
> >> > that we want to propose WG adoption of
> >> > draft-jiang-v6ops-incremental-cgn-03.txt
> >> >
> >> > It's been updated according to comments received by
> >> > September 25. We could describe those updates in a short
> >> > agenda slot.
> >> >
> >> >   Brian
> >> >
> >> > On 2009-10-08 04:54, Fred Baker wrote:
> >> >> We have two sessions scheduled in Hiroshima. This is a call for
> >> >> agenda
> >> >> items. Who wants time to talk?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
>
> =======================================
>
> Best regards,
> 13:12:00 2009-10-09
> ********************************************************
> *    Yong Cui                                          *
> *    Ph.D, Department of Computer Science & Technology *
> *    Tsinghua University, Beijing, P.R.China(100084)   *
> *    Tel: (8610)-62603059                              *
> *    Email: yong@csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn             *
> ********************************************************
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email