IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Agenda call

"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Thu, 08 October 2009 15:29 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A573A693E for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.974
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.974 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.479, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5b8hOcJkaexh for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A493528C1B7 for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1Mvuqe-000M9x-E3 for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:24:08 +0000
Received: from [130.76.64.48] (helo=slb-smtpout-01.boeing.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>) id 1MvuqU-000M95-0p for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:24:05 +0000
Received: from blv-av-01.boeing.com (blv-av-01.boeing.com [130.247.48.231]) by slb-smtpout-01.ns.cs.boeing.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/8.14.0/SMTPOUT) with ESMTP id n98FNavk013469 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blv-av-01.boeing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blv-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/DOWNSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id n98FNaLt014644; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from XCH-NWHT-11.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-11.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.25.114]) by blv-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/UPSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id n98FNZkK014640 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK); Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from XCH-NW-15V.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.104]) by XCH-NWHT-11.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.114]) with mapi; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:23:35 -0700
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:23:34 -0700
Subject: RE: Agenda call
Thread-Topic: Agenda call
Thread-Index: AcpHuWoE+AcniIT0Tf+Blb47v680oAAcXsGg
Message-ID: <12F4112206976147A34FEC0277597CCF27A410A337@XCH-NW-15V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <E0A33250-B378-4CC4-AAFD-5045E60CFF03@cisco.com> <4ACD0BD3.4080705@gmail.com> <27A1609E-5988-41DB-A930-2ABB2EE261FB@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <27A1609E-5988-41DB-A930-2ABB2EE261FB@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-8.0.0.1181-5.600.1016-16888.004
x-tm-as-result: No--65.632000-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 6:21 PM
> To: IPv6 Operations
> Subject: Re: Agenda call
> 
> The authors wanted to ask about this at the last IETF meeting, and the
> discussion around the document told me that it wasn't ready for
> working group status.
> 
> Opinions at this point? Does this document represent something the
> working group wants to take on?

I reviewed the document, and IMHO it is stable enough
and relevant enough to take on as a wg item.

Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com
 
> On Oct 7, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
> > I'm not sure if Sheng is back on line, so let me say
> > that we want to propose WG adoption of
> > draft-jiang-v6ops-incremental-cgn-03.txt
> >
> > It's been updated according to comments received by
> > September 25. We could describe those updates in a short
> > agenda slot.
> >
> >   Brian
> >
> > On 2009-10-08 04:54, Fred Baker wrote:
> >> We have two sessions scheduled in Hiroshima. This is a call for
> >> agenda
> >> items. Who wants time to talk?
> >>
> >>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email