IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RE: Agenda call

bo zhou <zhouboyj@gmail.com> Sat, 10 October 2009 02:28 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C7E3A68D6 for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.684
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.684 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.190, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kjWl9PeT9cmM for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE8D3A6862 for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1MwRhL-000Mcf-1k for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 02:28:43 +0000
Received: from [209.85.223.178] (helo=mail-iw0-f178.google.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <zhouboyj@gmail.com>) id 1MwRh9-000Mbk-TJ for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 02:28:39 +0000
Received: by iwn8 with SMTP id 8so4270118iwn.33 for <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZUGaWrwEgBL9YesbfTdG0JYDuNDerAa5KbThPIpzHL4=; b=efft3m+sZ9Z+dyUaRwYG/THLWXhPNX+fvaom5a/fshZyF6JPZJtqdQwgbjS1WBM74K 1cGkPpEH4n7VI8ZAs53BLjKmObWJg3LUdZ1CLbuBRDwctUreXtfpe+YlsgjSBJqMMV3N mW6te6wNt968gJehD5OEJcsBqxqfcmmz5TzKA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=YvV1BxOSZK3dupmDBlNsCZ7BD59Yz5olUON5YIcZm7Ecbp1/A6wtYQrv2RL1XpQseL 373gnWCdKrAqF1jrKuHOJnlXocKJsvBQ/40LQROT//3pmqeEMCcbpMB5LRqTGR9zKU+Q p61DZB7LrxP7CQSOaaoO30hiEcYKqW5D+23XA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.122.103 with SMTP id k39mr6740031ibr.10.1255141711060; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <36ba02b00910091854ia395f26v99f47ad4b067691c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20091009051358.33DD130B0972@mail.jzland.com> <36ba02b00910091854ia395f26v99f47ad4b067691c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 10:28:31 +0800
Message-ID: <36a593230910091928ybd2fd98ke8c329a48a5a9960@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RE: Agenda call
From: bo zhou <zhouboyj@gmail.com>
To: Chen Gang <phdgang@gmail.com>
Cc: Yong <yong@csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn>, "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e6460848d4aac704758b7374"
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

I read through the draft, believe the issues that the draft try to sort out
are important and relevant enough to be a WG item at moment.

Regards,

Bo Zhou

On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Chen Gang <phdgang@gmail.com> wrote:

> CGN is a important approach for IPv6 transition and has numerous use cases
> in current network deployment. I also think it should be approved as a wg
> item.
>
> Gang
> chengang@chinamobile.com
>
>
>
> 2009/10/9 Yong <yong@csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn>
>
> I also agree to accept this I-D as WG document bacause I believe
>> dual-stack or IPv6-only ISP networks should be important parts
>> during the IPv4/IPv6 coexistence.
>>
>>
>> -Yong
>> yong@csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn
>>
>>
>> ======= 2009-10-08 23:23:34 You wrote =======
>>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Fred Baker
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 6:21 PM
>> >> To: IPv6 Operations
>> >> Subject: Re: Agenda call
>> >>
>> >> The authors wanted to ask about this at the last IETF meeting, and the
>> >> discussion around the document told me that it wasn't ready for
>> >> working group status.
>> >>
>> >> Opinions at this point? Does this document represent something the
>> >> working group wants to take on?
>> >
>> >I reviewed the document, and IMHO it is stable enough
>> >and relevant enough to take on as a wg item.
>> >
>> >Fred
>> >fred.l.templin@boeing.com
>> >
>> >> On Oct 7, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I'm not sure if Sheng is back on line, so let me say
>> >> > that we want to propose WG adoption of
>> >> > draft-jiang-v6ops-incremental-cgn-03.txt
>> >> >
>> >> > It's been updated according to comments received by
>> >> > September 25. We could describe those updates in a short
>> >> > agenda slot.
>> >> >
>> >> >   Brian
>> >> >
>> >> > On 2009-10-08 04:54, Fred Baker wrote:
>> >> >> We have two sessions scheduled in Hiroshima. This is a call for
>> >> >> agenda
>> >> >> items. Who wants time to talk?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>> =======================================
>>
>> Best regards,
>> 13:12:00 2009-10-09
>> ********************************************************
>> *    Yong Cui                                          *
>> *    Ph.D, Department of Computer Science & Technology *
>> *    Tsinghua University, Beijing, P.R.China(100084)   *
>> *    Tel: (8610)-62603059                              *
>> *    Email: yong@csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn             *
>> ********************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Regards,

Bo Zhou
China Mobile

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email