Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-08
Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Fri, 17 June 2016 11:47 UTC
Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B7212D533 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 04:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.026
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.026 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HV0tvNwspSKP for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 04:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [195.30.115.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 173F312D534 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 04:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0202603BC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:47:32 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AAD60878; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:47:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 44FA6345F4; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:47:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:47:32 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Marco Ermini <Marco.Ermini@ResMed.com>
Message-ID: <20160617114732.GK79185@Space.Net>
References: <D386FF93.75916%evyncke@cisco.com> <CAAedzxqBr=ApvGTUrjNUnRmpcamkt4OH1CchcDEWgDcXRgo8Fw@mail.gmail.com> <173d2c6b-4cbf-88da-cf20-710a90e04c7e@gmail.com> <38465846B6383D4A8688C0A13971900C48DBF82F@ge2eml2k1004> <CAO42Z2z_pgBrn3bNRagx4W2FYn4aJ=NYNGwzDk+Q2o373qux+A@mail.gmail.com> <38465846B6383D4A8688C0A13971900C48DBFD81@ge2eml2k1004>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <38465846B6383D4A8688C0A13971900C48DBFD81@ge2eml2k1004>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/DQoGuAP7kVOVhvVPjxCGZlyAN1g>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsec-v6@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-v6@ietf.org>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>, "linkedin@xn--debrn-nva.de" <linkedin@xn--debrn-nva.de>, "fgont@si6networks.com" <fgont@si6networks.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-08
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:47:38 -0000
Hi, On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:03:25AM +0000, Marco Ermini wrote: > NAT can be still necessary in IPv6 in dual-stack scenario, for instance, where every host is assigned both a IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and the CGN equipment can't handle them differently. Unfortunately RFC 4864 does not mention such case, AFAIK. Why would anyone route their IPv6 traffic to the IPv4 CGN box? CGN boxes are way expensive, so anyone with a calculator would route everything that does not need NAT around the CGN box. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-ops… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-ops… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [v6ops] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-ops… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [v6ops] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-ops… Markus deBruen
- Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-… Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-… Marco Ermini
- Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-… Marco Ermini
- Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-… Marco Ermini
- Re: [v6ops] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-ops… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-… Marco Ermini
- Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-… Marco Ermini
- Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-… Marco Ermini
- Re: [v6ops] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-ops… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-ops… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-ops… Sleigh, Robert
- [v6ops] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-opsec-v… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [v6ops] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-ops… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-ops… Howard, Lee
- Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-ops… Mark Smith