IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-08

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Fri, 08 July 2016 09:18 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2AFF12D0F7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 02:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.026
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.026 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oPpxzmmuU4-R for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 02:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [195.30.115.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3181C12D0B5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 02:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0D7626FC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 11:18:23 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EAE6069F; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 11:18:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 63609B36B; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 11:18:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 11:18:23 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20160708091823.GT79185@Space.Net>
References: <D386FF93.75916%evyncke@cisco.com> <CAAedzxqBr=ApvGTUrjNUnRmpcamkt4OH1CchcDEWgDcXRgo8Fw@mail.gmail.com> <D3A3D373.77252%evyncke@cisco.com> <CAAedzxpD4FXJLBgKg2tjGz5RNBp+iFe1M2M_upL1rYDXJA7SoA@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2xh33jiuCJ=Ypi1HuXa_h86v6XqqRT7nnirqx6da4cOZg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2xh33jiuCJ=Ypi1HuXa_h86v6XqqRT7nnirqx6da4cOZg@mail.gmail.com>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/OTxu4zTNa4c3MpmvR0s7-Nq7UKU>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsec-v6@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-v6@ietf.org>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>, "linkedin@xn--debrn-nva.de" <linkedin@xn--debrn-nva.de>, "fgont@si6networks.com" <fgont@si6networks.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-08
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 09:18:29 -0000

Hi,

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 06:51:21PM +1000, Mark Smith wrote:
> Depending on an experimental RFC for your security sounds like a
> really bad idea to me!

But NATs are good!  I've seen it on youtube, so it must be true!

gert

(And yes, it *is* Friday)
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email