IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-08

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Thu, 07 July 2016 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB6512D0A4; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 08:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dW5iYVQE0uOh; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 08:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 959AB12D08C; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 08:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1240; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1467906100; x=1469115700; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=dUsEsosyrqI/s3bchjOiG5COF2Ywi1Fu9NbLT/5CAds=; b=h5+EKqjKT5vwUSev78FwNNdkr9v7Mx6Enm6NFoyD5Fb1czLedAnyPO59 5gk0aI0Ab2TKrkYwJRGNERSEM/4TfcKmu2u2eETQjXlYsvl7f/jLHMtT4 FMKq6nxLpRfVNtUliqgMbavVY4oEV7JK7QkCkEDNnswXddqyF6ZaIUJ5X Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AMBQDhd35X/49dJa1cgz6BUga5CYF7hhgCHIEOOhIBAQEBAQEBZSeETQEFIxFFEAIBCA4MAiYCAgIwFRACBA4FiDCtR48yAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBH4EBhSaETYRAF4JqgloBBJkTAY5GjyqQCQElDCODcW6HfX8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,324,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="294942663"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Jul 2016 15:41:27 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u67FfRDK020489 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:41:27 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 11:41:26 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 11:41:26 -0400
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-08
Thread-Index: AQHRxvO7NZqKAcq6O0Gp7Rf6mrYAKJ/rMhmAgCHqgoA=
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 15:41:26 +0000
Message-ID: <D3A3D373.77252%evyncke@cisco.com>
References: <D386FF93.75916%evyncke@cisco.com> <CAAedzxqBr=ApvGTUrjNUnRmpcamkt4OH1CchcDEWgDcXRgo8Fw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAedzxqBr=ApvGTUrjNUnRmpcamkt4OH1CchcDEWgDcXRgo8Fw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.3.160329
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.159.132]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <4D195856320BA4449589E1A3D66A69BB@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/pPuPdgiCFVzUvFwHHVcH85AFt-4>
Cc: "fgont@si6networks.com" <fgont@si6networks.com>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsec-v6@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-v6@ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "linkedin@xn--debrn-nva.de" <linkedin@xn--debrn-nva.de>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-08
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 15:41:42 -0000

Erik

Thanks for you review (and BTW, I am out of steam/time to process more
comments on this thread before posting the -09 => I will process _ALL_
comments later)

-éric


On 15/06/16 21:45, "Erik Kline" <ek@google.com> wrote:

>Section 2.1.2 is far too permissive for my tastes.  We need to be able
>to say that ULA+IPv6 NAT is NOT RECOMMENDED by the IETF.

I changed the end of the section 2.1.2 to reflect this. Albeit, I am
unsure whether there is a clear statement by the IETF about not using ULA
+ NPTv6 (and I would LOVE to see such a statement)

>
>Section 2.6.1.5 could punch up the SAVI stuff a bit more as well.  We
>should, in my opinion, make it painfully clear that DHCP (of any
>protocol) in the absence of link-layer security/auditability features
>does not provide any satisfactory way "to ensure audibility and
>traceability" [Section 2.1.6].

Done


>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email