IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] WGLC: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-02 - multiple prefixes per device

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 17 March 2017 11:51 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98C6126DEE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 04:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.332
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.332 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5qrS6lCXHoMX for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 04:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FCDC126C22 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 04:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id v2HBp3AC030207; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:51:03 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id C2FD2204247; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:51:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B20202E66; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:51:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v2HBp36i032003; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:51:03 +0100
To: otroan@employees.org, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <BLUPR0501MB2051704E825BCA03EEB09D79AE240@BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <c8c0f5be-28bb-ba31-16da-7fc7e3fccec0@gmail.com> <20170316082639.GF2367@Space.Net> <29F9E911-E637-456D-A930-3316FFD93C41@jisc.ac.uk> <27AE6A05-C742-44BF-98E8-BFCEC72316F2@employees.org> <EF0F4950-F238-4001-BA74-D9440524BEFA@gmail.com> <634a6a12-4d82-da33-6d1d-baae2e5b2891@gmail.com> <13DA8077-91C1-4B3F-9D67-3727F546D202@employees.org> <13194a4f-aeda-63b0-0293-6bc738b068f2@gmail.com> <4D60B43B-24F9-4701-800E-13CF32CD4769@employees.org> <8fc7f3e7-7155-f184-c028-a9f6da7e97db@gmail.com> <D32A31B3-8DB3-444D-B320-B68830A8C4AB@employees.org>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6765b1fb-9fca-f434-0975-4c7637a15e49@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:50:55 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D32A31B3-8DB3-444D-B320-B68830A8C4AB@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/EScLLeYbShLA54w0_P05nF6xkcI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] WGLC: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-02 - multiple prefixes per device
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 11:51:09 -0000


Le 16/03/2017 à 18:38, otroan@employees.org a écrit :
[...]
> At at the local coffee shop or at your favourite Enterprise you would
> be very lucky if you got more than a /64 assigned to the host.

Why?

> Enterprises often don't like you to extend their network, nor do the
> coffee shop want to run multiple provisioning protocols.

Why dont they want to run multiple provisioning protocols?

Does the hotel like to ask each time a customer how many Devices the 
customer has?  Isnt that too heavy to manage?

Alex
>
> Cheers, Ole
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email