Re: [v6ops] senario of draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf-00.txt
joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Tue, 07 August 2012 16:34 UTC
Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38FA21F84FD for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.431
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.431 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.168, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kkb-Z0LvpSqp for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A8421F84F2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joels-MacBook-Air.local (host-64-47-153-50.masergy.com [64.47.153.50]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q77GXwvt061903 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 16:33:58 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <50214371.1080003@bogus.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 09:33:53 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120731 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
References: <201208072051330785547@gmail.com> <B830C0C1-5FC9-43B3-81F2-01F0A96BA9C0@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <B830C0C1-5FC9-43B3-81F2-01F0A96BA9C0@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Tue, 07 Aug 2012 16:33:59 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] senario of draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 16:34:03 -0000
On 8/7/12 8:36 AM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: > Personally, I think you will be far better off with a router. And in any event, this is BBF territory; if the BBF wants to have IETF collusion, we can discuss that, but I think you need first to discuss it with them. Realistically if there's one customer and one or two vendors they don't need the blessing of a standards body to solve their problem... I see discussing this in the IETF essentially a question of determining if there are other networks with a similar or related problem. I agree that layer-2 interworking is not generally the domain of IETF.
- [v6ops] senario of draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf-0… zveno.chen
- Re: [v6ops] scenario of draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-… Maglione Roberta
- Re: [v6ops] scenario of draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-… zveno.chen
- Re: [v6ops] senario of draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-i… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] senario of draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-i… joel jaeggli