IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] scenario of draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf-00.txt

Maglione Roberta <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it> Tue, 07 August 2012 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FECE21F86C7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 06:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.656
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.656 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_75=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LMVxJUr4NVCI for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 06:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GRFEDG701BA020.telecomitalia.it (grfedg701ba020.telecomitalia.it [156.54.233.200]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FE921F86CB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 06:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grfhub704ba020.griffon.local (10.188.101.117) by GRFEDG701BA020.telecomitalia.it (10.188.45.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.245.1; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:12:32 +0200
Received: from GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local ([10.188.101.15]) by grfhub704ba020.griffon.local ([10.188.101.117]) with mapi; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:12:32 +0200
From: Maglione Roberta <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>
To: "'zveno.chen'" <zveno.chen@gmail.com>, "Will Liu (Shucheng)" <liushucheng@huawei.com>, "fred@cisco.com" <fred@cisco.com>, "wesley.george" <wesley.george@twcable.com>, lorenzo <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:12:32 +0200
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] scenario of draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf-00.txt
Thread-Index: Ac10nFHNdLsaK3K9QnuWVAqQ3IBQMQAAPqsg
Message-ID: <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE519702F135@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local>
References: <201208072051330785547@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201208072051330785547@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
x-ti-disclaimer: Disclaimer1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] scenario of draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 13:12:40 -0000

Hello,
   If I understand your draft correctly you are proposing a new interworking function on the Access Node, so you are basically specifying new requirements for the Access Node.
Why are you discussing this topic in IETF? Isn't this Broadband Forum's territory? BBF is the SDO that specifies requirements for Access Node and if I remember correctly this interworking function was discussed and finally not included in TR-177 some years.
If you think this work is needed, for the scenario you described, I would suggest discussing this proposal in BBF first.

Best Regards,
Roberta

-----Original Message-----
From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of zveno.chen
Sent: martedì 7 agosto 2012 14.52
To: Will Liu (Shucheng); fred@cisco.com; wesley.george; lorenzo
Cc: v6ops
Subject: [v6ops] senario of draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf-00.txt

HI,

    The senario of IPv6oA is exist in Chinatelecom network. In our IPV4 network some of our customers uses a service called ATM private-Line. In this service, user's CPE device connect to core network by IPoA (PVC/SVC) , and uses stable IP address. In the future, with the development of IPv6 ,these customer will hope to transfer their service to IPv6,but they donot want to use IP access network(maybe they donot want to change their network sharply). In this secanrio, we think IPv6oA will be a choice to solve the problem. And upgrade a IPv4 IWF to DS IWF may be economical

--------------
ZhongHua Chen

Chinatelecom
2012-08-07




_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.

This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email