IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Net Neutrality question

"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> Thu, 19 November 2015 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981621B2B51 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 07:17:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VK4m8tsjaMXu for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 07:17:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EB511B2B4E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 07:17:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1123; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1447946233; x=1449155833; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=yKM3DrmyqnIqOnob8abvAifaLyMtG3l17O1mZdbdR6I=; b=OBB7er8G65c72am3eyYIbUBQUaI1j+NMTReuDk/7Vdyq3q4ciANUq3/j GErsy6MF/tibD2gbnKQfyr9P8KY9pRcUGaAG5j0oS45XZcKFxRTI9N7zI tjI8zw0zRAFpZcw8JieTyqSmOagEpA9d0kS7cQtu1LlcX58MUxIus7w0P E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ANAgCW5k1W/4wNJK1egztTbwa+awENgWUchXMCgUo4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQ0AQEBAwE6PwUHBAIBCBEEAQEBHgkHMhQJCAIEAQ0FCIgeCA2/bwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARiLUok5BZZMAY0mnE0BHwEBQoIRHYFWcgGEGIEHAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,318,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="48257151"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 19 Nov 2015 15:17:13 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tAJFHCmM006255 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:17:13 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-005.cisco.com (64.101.220.145) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:17:12 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-005.cisco.com ([64.101.220.145]) by XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com ([64.101.220.145]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:17:12 -0500
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Net Neutrality question
Thread-Index: AQHRIn3I03cONo/ye0GO4yyDa7Yi9Z6jNOYAgAADsACAAD0X8A==
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:17:12 +0000
Message-ID: <5ef7badfcbc34622b98ce4c5bcd619f5@XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com>
References: <4E9C6C1B-9F9C-4AD7-9822-DFFC8E406F86@cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511190713590.24520@uplift.swm.pp.se> <95C1B3DD-C547-490B-B8DC-8B66C6C670F5@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <95C1B3DD-C547-490B-B8DC-8B66C6C670F5@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.131.77.48]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/GbFSekJfeVJ0bQ-8DWdH7oOiuqg>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Net Neutrality question
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:17:46 -0000

Here is a MQC sample configuration.

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/isg/configuration/xe-3s/isg-xe-3s-book/isg-mqc-ip-sess.html#GUID-24165B88-F485-48B1-9BF4-7278A12E4912

Hemant

-----Original Message-----
From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker (fred)
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 1:38 AM
To: Mikael Abrahamsson
Cc: IPv6 Operations
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Net Neutrality question


> On Nov 19, 2015, at 7:25 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> 
> However, the operator has to be careful to keep the AFnX in the same queue so reordering doesn't happen, that might be something good to point out because it's not obvious to everybody. Also, equipment that would use AFnX for drop probability within the same queue, that's not something I think is very commonly available today. I don't remember seeing this myself in any equipment I have come across...

It's on Cisco equipment running IOS, and I believe IOS-XR and friends. I'll send you the MQC Configuration if you're interested. I can't speak to anything else.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email