IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Net Neutrality question

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Thu, 19 November 2015 13:32 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607DE1AD35A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 05:32:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hmOSdav0S2H2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 05:32:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D141E1AD358 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 05:32:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Envelope-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from dhcp-28-83.ripemtg.ripe.net ([46.182.8.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id tAJDWKiJ017670 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:32:20 GMT (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host [46.182.8.8] claimed to be dhcp-28-83.ripemtg.ripe.net
To: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>, Ivan Pepelnjak <ipepelnjak@gmail.com>, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <4E9C6C1B-9F9C-4AD7-9822-DFFC8E406F86@cisco.com> <etPan.564d6fd4.4318fd2a.14a93@Ivans-MacBook-Pro.local> <be28e79330de4437aa7760379ca8359e@XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <564DCF64.9040105@foobar.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:32:20 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <be28e79330de4437aa7760379ca8359e@XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/GcsNt-nKmAOsc8_8EOi3NBw27E8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Net Neutrality question
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:32:34 -0000

On 19/11/2015 15:12, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:
> A network access edge router such as the Cisco CMTS (Cable Modem
> Termination System) router supports STM (Subscriber Traffic Management)
> via which each subscriber's traffic can be tracked.   Other Cisco access
> edge routers support STM as well.

cmts boxes are generally quite weird and not representative of how IP is
handled on anything other type of access delivery.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email