IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Net Neutrality question

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 19 November 2015 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722501A89E9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:38:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rtmtcCJpXHws for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:38:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E03251A89C6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:38:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2006; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1447915100; x=1449124700; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=PDnxAWtRraARTIUY81isT0GusLyZKUVRsJQBfPe8tLA=; b=Shtw/w3Aa9zrrDEpAkbY/IoFbREmpQ8hY8ViLLhES0vl2WxM8Fd7uLGW R375ViBfzRQYT1+LRmHEqim/4HikZ82S94f+7q91Yp7zPyo0xLzJRrlMK HprNUIuoWb9FFhSE6ooc8ZieLq8hCWFndmaBJnQwCRVRwp/nxQPPkknLL A=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DOAgBobU1W/49dJa1egzuBQga+Yg6BZYYPAoFBOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqENAEBAQMBeQULAgEIDgouMiUCBA4FDogYCL8jAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBDwmIZIJuiCSBFQWWSgGCVoFgiHScRAEfAUOEBHKEGYEHAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,317,1444694400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="209919450"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Nov 2015 06:38:20 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tAJ6cJH8003498 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:38:19 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 01:38:18 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 01:38:18 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Net Neutrality question
Thread-Index: AQHRIpTgTDi2LgMGjEa6jL5mlPKdLw==
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:38:18 +0000
Message-ID: <95C1B3DD-C547-490B-B8DC-8B66C6C670F5@cisco.com>
References: <4E9C6C1B-9F9C-4AD7-9822-DFFC8E406F86@cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511190713590.24520@uplift.swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511190713590.24520@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.66.255.204]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F9DE3023-A6B7-4103-8746-A9B7AC3AC4C3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/aUX3ujxlk0DDTHV4x8_J6bpbEz0>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Net Neutrality question
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:38:23 -0000

> On Nov 19, 2015, at 7:25 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> 
> However, the operator has to be careful to keep the AFnX in the same queue so reordering doesn't happen, that might be something good to point out because it's not obvious to everybody. Also, equipment that would use AFnX for drop probability within the same queue, that's not something I think is very commonly available today. I don't remember seeing this myself in any equipment I have come across...

It's on Cisco equipment running IOS, and I believe IOS-XR and friends. I'll send you the MQC Configuration if you're interested. I can't speak to anything else.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email