IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] HE Reporting (draft-palet-ietf-v6ops-he-reporting-00)

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 18 October 2017 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F5D13432C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hD17QC5Ym4dh for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22c.google.com (mail-pf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AC9E132620 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id t188so4849161pfd.10 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=tFA9NqkgKBVffOZZCvSTMFl36+QSWfbWbbndGTJL09c=; b=phAoJPLypX3GdMOWhCDdTIFif4xltRnnx4OZ+IIh5P6AMJQuabp1iqVmO9ei/Vx0el T4BQ/+pjCkdIMZoSLAYT8jdn4T6udjAM7UzfNOZII0mrZ4VLhIsV0JEDtXuFRUGfJdcV 1j4TTYp78RZiNAnre8bHpaN4dGIGjwARU7nH0LsWxhiXTcymZ83rqfCvd+KMR9DfRWcK STfQ9nkd9kwXpHi/PSGFq1pGAj9jlpR2ZOSNbfWherosuaJBeTjX5++aIKh6zIAXJSwJ tlDC/gjikeEdVI0vvut8J0iT0HjUAbIK5BPcRgcRjqRZRKGUZRHpHEoO6SxCJ5zEP6ek 8W6g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=tFA9NqkgKBVffOZZCvSTMFl36+QSWfbWbbndGTJL09c=; b=Wb23ccVjt7yokafj280S7anM6rl83HQIWScGKNCPpPlg2VcuRr+a2N8e+7gn7KmCoN 8GoRPT5+XFMnV2S5s5fTudtqQFa/oqhZiHOSoV9U7ulNG57+a52Epok2t+QOXC1ZGDYt 9OEtTqSng8E0ryA2qtmqDbjADX1o74EsoUVk7uY3HjfY5RBK7G/AKS20w14eXNzf2DxY ygOh/2D9/l0/x5arbovZGyy1wJzMxBrZpf56yuyUZHfD20Pn+XlCg8tWVT2uEEGx8s0w WjB2E3A4mTgCxD8zM1JLV3DkrWPk6rrProTJ2ZpgPPoNIy4HTmnLfOAnPNXZfyFRlOg4 wVjw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVJr9cTaxcMpaAak868wBGwt8uG2o15hYJzect8x/4zsqOrGKZN LxuhN2DbiqDdZL5/1UWD2XY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SiAf6/IiG/uf1AAoTkeFQcWxrXjIBesAo9vVret8/F8RFFyIRByL5vcZOB9JywOi4qjsUeEQ==
X-Received: by 10.101.81.67 with SMTP id g3mr8853858pgq.262.1508360660939; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:04:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2607:fb90:9d0d:740a:65d2:2e4e:1c17:be9f? ([2607:fb90:9d0d:740a:65d2:2e4e:1c17:be9f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z65sm20275885pgb.50.2017.10.18.14.04.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:04:20 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-85B9620A-BCC0-4B17-B2E8-74F935005009"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15A432)
In-Reply-To: <4ED79F88-1E2A-41D2-BC24-6844E62688E9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:04:18 -0700
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1EB9B021-D344-4229-84F6-A41388892C2B@gmail.com>
References: <4ED79F88-1E2A-41D2-BC24-6844E62688E9@gmail.com>
To: "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/J2C8kl3YCtWbGcNfW3LJ-X0ngYY>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] HE Reporting (draft-palet-ietf-v6ops-he-reporting-00)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:04:23 -0000

Happy to see additional discussion. We’re assessing the agenda for IETF 100; are you proposing a topic there?

Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways...

> On Oct 18, 2017, at 12:20 PM, Carlos M. Martinez <carlosm3011@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I’d like to propose we have some additional discussion on draft-palet-ietf-v6ops-he-reporting-00. Particularly I’d like to separate the problem itself from the solution proposed.
> 
> I believe it’s a problem worth addressing and would provide useful information for operators working on and troubleshooting their early IPv6 deployments.
> 
> From my recollections of the last discussions there were some concerns regarding the solution the draft actually proposes. I’d like to re-start the discussion on that particular topic:
> 
> what properties should the solution have ?
> what is the minimal set of information that a device could report that is useful for network troubleshooting ?
> thanks!
> 
> /Carlos
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email