Re: [v6ops] Agenda scheduling for IETF 79

[Tina TSOU <[e-mail]>]

Hi Fred,
Just a minor reminder that you said 0.75 to 1.5 sessions will be  
allocated to v4v6tran work.
Here is the record.
https://cisco.webex.com/ciscosales/lsr.php?AT=pb&SP=MC&rID=46384302&rKey=10def3e927a116b3


B. R.
Tina
http://tinatsou.weebly.com




On Oct 2, 2010, at 2:35 AM, Fred Baker wrote:

> On Oct 1, 2010, at 9:19 AM, IETF Secretariat wrote:
>> Dear Fred Baker,
>>
>> The sessions that you have requested have been scheduled.
>> Below is the scheduled session information followed by
>> the information of sessions that you have requested.
>>
>> V6OPS Session 1 (2.5 hours)
>> Wednesday, Morning Session I 0900-1130
>> Room Name: Valley Ballroom B
>> ----------------------------------------------
>> V6OPS Session 2 (2.5 hours)
>> Friday, Afternoon Session I 1300-1500
>> Room Name: Valley Ballroom A
>> ----------------------------------------------
>
>
> On Oct 1, 2010, at 11:07 AM, IETF Agenda wrote:
>> The DRAFT agenda is ready for viewing.  Please note the cutoff date  
>> for
>> requests to reschedule Working Group and BOF meetings is October  
>> 11, 2010
>> 17:00 PT.  The final agenda will be published on October 15, 2010.
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/79/agenda.html
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/79/agenda.txt
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/meeting/79/index.html
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Wanda
>>
>> Only 36 days until the Beijing IETF!
>> Online registration for the IETF meeting is at:
>> http://www.ietf.org/meetings/79/
>
>
> Joel, Kurtis, and I are starting to assemble the IETF 79 Agenda.  
> What I have at this instant is at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/agenda/v6ops.html 
> . I requested two morning (2.5 hours) slots; I got one morning slot  
> and "Friday afternoon until we stop talking" - nominally two hours,  
> but Wanda tells me she has noted that we will likely run over. It  
> looks like we will have a pretty full agenda; between the -v4v6tran-  
> and -v6ops- work, we have a total of 18 drafts.
>
> Anything I have missed - drop us a note at v6ops- 
> [e-mail] if you would. The chairs have not yet  
> discussed this in detail amongst ourselves yet, so I'm not sure  
> which day will get which topic, and there are other reorganizations  
> that could happen. If folks have strong opinions, that too would be  
> interesting to know.
>
> This assumes, btw, that the WGLCs that we have been running mean  
> that we don't need to discuss those drafts. Besides the drafts on  
> the agenda, our status is:
>
> To complete WGLC before IETF 79
> 	draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines    (waiting new draft)
> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns (waiting document writeup)
> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-incremental-cgn          (just completed WGLC)
> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-loops             (in WGLC)
> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-in-mobile-networks    (October 11-24)
> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-48boundary       (Oct 24-Nov 7)
>
> In IESG discussion:
> 	draft-gundavelli-v6ops-l2-unicast-04	
> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-14	
> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-08
> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-rogue-ra-01 (Needs an updated draft from Tim)
>
> RFC Editor Queue		
> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-07
> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios-00
> 	draft-thaler-v6ops-teredo-extensions-08
>
> Dead?
> 	draft-sarikaya-v6ops-prefix-delegation-01		
>
> Recent RFCs:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5963.txt
> 5963 IPv6 Deployment in Internet Exchange Points (IXPs). R. Gagliano.
>     August 2010. (Format: TXT=22786 bytes) (Status: INFORMATIONAL)
>
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5991.txt
> 5991 Teredo Security Updates. D. Thaler, S. Krishnan, J. Hoagland.
>     September 2010. (Format: TXT=20847 bytes) (Updates RFC4380)  
> (Status:
>     PROPOSED STANDARD)
>
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6018.txt
> 6018 IPv4 and IPv6 Greynets. F. Baker, W. Harrop, G. Armitage.
>     September 2010. (Format: TXT=21541 bytes) (Status: INFORMATIONAL)
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops