[v6ops] Agenda scheduling for IETF 79

[Fred Baker <[e-mail]>]

On Oct 1, 2010, at 9:19 AM, IETF Secretariat wrote:
> Dear Fred Baker,
> 
> The sessions that you have requested have been scheduled.
> Below is the scheduled session information followed by 
> the information of sessions that you have requested.
> 
> V6OPS Session 1 (2.5 hours)
> Wednesday, Morning Session I 0900-1130
> Room Name: Valley Ballroom B
> ----------------------------------------------
> V6OPS Session 2 (2.5 hours)
> Friday, Afternoon Session I 1300-1500
> Room Name: Valley Ballroom A
> ----------------------------------------------


On Oct 1, 2010, at 11:07 AM, IETF Agenda wrote:
> The DRAFT agenda is ready for viewing.  Please note the cutoff date for
> requests to reschedule Working Group and BOF meetings is October 11, 2010
> 17:00 PT.  The final agenda will be published on October 15, 2010.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/79/agenda.html
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/79/agenda.txt
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/meeting/79/index.html
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Wanda
> 
> Only 36 days until the Beijing IETF!
> Online registration for the IETF meeting is at:
> http://www.ietf.org/meetings/79/


Joel, Kurtis, and I are starting to assemble the IETF 79 Agenda. What I have at this instant is at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/agenda/v6ops.html. I requested two morning (2.5 hours) slots; I got one morning slot and "Friday afternoon until we stop talking" - nominally two hours, but Wanda tells me she has noted that we will likely run over. It looks like we will have a pretty full agenda; between the -v4v6tran- and -v6ops- work, we have a total of 18 drafts.  

Anything I have missed - drop us a note at [e-mail] if you would. The chairs have not yet discussed this in detail amongst ourselves yet, so I'm not sure which day will get which topic, and there are other reorganizations that could happen. If folks have strong opinions, that too would be interesting to know.

This assumes, btw, that the WGLCs that we have been running mean that we don't need to discuss those drafts. Besides the drafts on the agenda, our status is:

To complete WGLC before IETF 79
	draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines    (waiting new draft)
	draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns (waiting document writeup)
	draft-ietf-v6ops-incremental-cgn          (just completed WGLC)
	draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-loops             (in WGLC)
	draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-in-mobile-networks    (October 11-24)
	draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-48boundary       (Oct 24-Nov 7)

In IESG discussion:
	draft-gundavelli-v6ops-l2-unicast-04	
	draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-14	
	draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-08
	draft-ietf-v6ops-rogue-ra-01 (Needs an updated draft from Tim)

RFC Editor Queue		
	draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-07
	draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios-00
	draft-thaler-v6ops-teredo-extensions-08

Dead?
	draft-sarikaya-v6ops-prefix-delegation-01		

Recent RFCs:

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5963.txt
5963 IPv6 Deployment in Internet Exchange Points (IXPs). R. Gagliano.
     August 2010. (Format: TXT=22786 bytes) (Status: INFORMATIONAL)

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5991.txt
5991 Teredo Security Updates. D. Thaler, S. Krishnan, J. Hoagland.
     September 2010. (Format: TXT=20847 bytes) (Updates RFC4380) (Status:
     PROPOSED STANDARD)

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6018.txt
6018 IPv4 and IPv6 Greynets. F. Baker, W. Harrop, G. Armitage.
     September 2010. (Format: TXT=21541 bytes) (Status: INFORMATIONAL)