Re: [v6ops] Agenda scheduling for IETF 79

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 04 October 2010 05:43 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518D63A6E0A for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 22:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A65sS+0M1KrJ for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 22:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4998C3A6DEB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 22:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAH8GqUxAZnwM/2dsb2JhbACiQnGIGZxlm0qFRwSKQIMC
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,277,1283731200"; d="scan'208";a="166454528"
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com ([64.102.124.12]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Oct 2010 05:44:18 +0000
Received: from Freds-Computer.local (rtp-vpn2-1853.cisco.com [10.82.247.64]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o945i3fQ003204; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 05:44:12 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by Freds-Computer.local (PGP Universal service); Mon, 04 Oct 2010 01:44:18 -0400
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Freds-Computer.local on Mon, 04 Oct 2010 01:44:18 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <1E6E380B-D0A3-41E1-BC62-8B1A2C97C657@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 01:37:34 -0400
Message-Id: <8C84858E-038D-4F2F-9C69-8D2A443CF2D1@cisco.com>
References: <20101001161955.7BE263A6CEF@core3.amsl.com> <47DA25FF-863C-4173-A038-93B2F30BA097@cisco.com> <1E6E380B-D0A3-41E1-BC62-8B1A2C97C657@huawei.com>
To: Tina TSOU <tena@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, V6ops Chairs <v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, v6ops-ads@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Agenda scheduling for IETF 79
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 05:43:27 -0000

On Oct 3, 2010, at 5:52 AM, Tina TSOU wrote:

> Hi Fred,
> Just a minor reminder that you said 0.75 to 1.5 sessions will be allocated to v4v6tran work.
> Here is the record.
> https://cisco.webex.com/ciscosales/lsr.php?AT=pb&SP=MC&rID=46384302&rKey=10def3e927a116b3 

After you look at the posted agenda, please feel free to comment on it.

> B. R.
> Tina
> http://tinatsou.weebly.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 2, 2010, at 2:35 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
> 
>> On Oct 1, 2010, at 9:19 AM, IETF Secretariat wrote:
>>> Dear Fred Baker,
>>> 
>>> The sessions that you have requested have been scheduled.
>>> Below is the scheduled session information followed by 
>>> the information of sessions that you have requested.
>>> 
>>> V6OPS Se blockquote>
>>>> Wednesday, Morning Session I 0900-1130
>>>> Room Name: Valley Ballroom B
>>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>> V6OPS Session 2 (2.5 hours)
>>>> Friday, Afternoon Session I 1300-1500
>>>> Room Name: Valley Ballroom A
>>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Oct 1, 2010, at 11:07 AM, IETF Agenda wrote:
>>>> The DRAFT agenda is ready for viewing.  Please note the cutoff date for
>>>> requests to reschedule Working Group and BOF meetings is October 11, 2010
>>>> 17:00 PT.  The final agenda will be published on October 15, 2010.
>>>> 
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/79/agenda.html
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/79/agenda.txt
>>> 
>>> http://www.ietf.org/meeting/79/index.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Wanda
>>> 
>>> Only 36 days until the Beijing IETF!
>>> Online registration for the IETF meeting is at:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/meetings/79/
>> 
>> 
>> Joel, Kurtis, and I are sta F 79 Agenda. What I have at this instant is at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/agenda/v6ops.html. I requested two morning (2.5 hours) slots; I got one morning slot and "Friday afternoon until we stop talking" - nominally two hours, but Wanda tells me she has noted that we will likely run over. It looks like we will have a pretty full agenda; between the -v4v6tran- and -v6ops- work, we have a total of 18 drafts.  
>> 
>> Anything I have missed - drop us a note at v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org if you would. The chairs have not yet discussed this in detail amongst ourselves yet, so I'm not sure which day will get which topic, and there are other reorganizations that could happen. If folks have strong opinions, that too would be interesting to know.
>> 
>> This assumes, btw, that the WGLCs that we have been running mean that we don't need to discuss those draf ts. Besi nda, our status is:
>> 
>> To complete WGLC before IETF 79
>> 	draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines    (waiting new draft)
>> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns (waiting document writeup)
>> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-incremental-cgn          (just completed WGLC)
>> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-loops             (in WGLC)
>> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-in-mobile-networks    (October 11-24)
>> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-48boundary       (Oct 24-Nov 7)
>> 
>> In IESG discu ssion:	draft-gundavelli-v6ops-l2-unicast-04	
>> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-14	
>> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-08
>> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-rogue-ra-01 (Needs an updated draft from Tim)
>> 
>> RFC Editor Queue		
>> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-07
>> 	draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios-00
>> 	draft-thaler-v6ops-teredo-extensions-08
>> 
>> Dead?
>> 	draft-sarikaya-v6ops-prefix-delegation-01		
>> 
>> Recent RFCs:
>> 
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5963.txt
>> 5963 IPv6 Deployment in Internet Exchange Points (IXPs). R. Gagliano.
>>     August 2010. (Format: TXT=22786 bytes) (Status: INFORMATIONAL)
>> 
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5991.txt
>> 5991 Teredo Security Updates. D. Thaler, S. Krishnan, J. Hoagland.
>>     September 2010. (Format: TXT=20847 bytes) (Updates RFC4380) (Status:
>>     PROPOSED STANDARD)
>> 
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6018.txt
>> 6018 IPv4 and IPv6 Greynets. F. Baker, W. Harrop, G. Armitage.
>>     September 2010. (Format: TXT=21541 bytes) (Status: INFORMATIONAL)
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops