IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Routers are hosts too! (Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-04.txt)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 07 January 2016 13:04 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DE51A8973 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 05:04:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Msf-Sbtha9J for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 05:04:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com (mail-qk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB8B81A8983 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 05:04:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id n135so176454527qka.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 05:04:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=ULAwTHEuNjdRipazED3jjGiqJdy6I2gViqSfV1tuseQ=; b=bS2uutcLKM1VieAKBNjNb8ncqi2Gs8rzGU0p92WJfnDZMAp+/EZysqlIF6RhdLqC8g 3CxgqoRshLrF074Qnc9NMj5bRlOzhGtyNmhwkBek4fJQa4j1YM43YMmZR0DZgwweAsNA UILCyPF1w0yWKOKzJTqAqVigv1+f0qESjCYqcgW91fcaCFrFT5zXreEEd4l7TOU+jWIN BwYIqMowGZftUxY4hBQu/Tzb292R1VNEg+w6KDiimtTQST6CqGtnOH74extAE8irySEV 2d+Hg8kXq532+Ez6zWbsZ/DMvrPnpWy4q7hAY6ilYFrFNIaAhcNgBPIm4kXJ24K17CdQ UFuA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=ULAwTHEuNjdRipazED3jjGiqJdy6I2gViqSfV1tuseQ=; b=O36UnTiuocDmxOnkxBhYY1Rtsf4cEfYvafan9lLAQ5DM8rlIrycAXkNDCeBlU0hgfa BBEg6zCB/eHwu3/U2tuZxbpA5MCuO1MCB6YOqO79yH2b8atWqs2SYVKpe7tkh5Xnl85k ZH5JbSdGusN96saGAwb6Ca4yuYb6/aoyE2WPJsr8Zp/5Cui+aSucG8k6dJmHhasTsGJx 8HFhut7r0YF87VEbUO0Rrg1yk2HiN/GeZ3eF+dqp+0FEWGRGz/wDk946zAvvFxYOXcY6 9+gjYangiWAa7xkE70aq+zx3a9N9VzdddgwxYEcOKhEJAhbRDp+L2hLOhzLGd+afb8kO sTrQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm3q55TIKmbEfhDDuoTVXE/Beh8je6dyc+Sg86r4VCNsrmznkwAGomFH/qP79M4fJEYUmB92K24K+nktJndOqiHl2ak22JZqipwt2yqEpVlUOyXx2A=
X-Received: by 10.13.238.194 with SMTP id x185mr84429332ywe.35.1452171846774; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 05:04:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.208.201 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 05:03:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D2B41EA5.63D4B%evyncke@cisco.com>
References: <CAO42Z2zU12bHqh2DiCeT2MOE6txh1cKbU9DasSjozQ166knVdQ@mail.gmail.com> <D2B410BA.63D18%evyncke@cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr1fFR9mzBiiBJtvmdg1XZpwmnPvr1N9kmz3sqr6SUHfjg@mail.gmail.com> <D2B41EA5.63D4B%evyncke@cisco.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:03:47 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2ppJ2W3UhaiqOhGPyak=PuhYYpLyiFKd4trdsuqxKYQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c03109414fa1f0528be1b2d"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/NPNI8PMOf-GrSPc6bW54NGeEPmQ>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Routers are hosts too! (Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-04.txt)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 13:04:09 -0000

Wrong link, sorry. Here's the right one.
https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/rrasblog/2007/01/23/broadband-connections-and-dhcpv6-prefix-delegation-in-windows-vista/

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com>
wrote:

> I like it when my pessimistic view is correct :-)
>
> OTOH, the Windows blog states "DHCPv6 Stateful mode is where a client
> uses DHCPv6 to obtain an IPv6 address from the DHCPv6 server along with
> other configuraiton parameters." so no hint about DHCP-PD... This was my
> concern about DHCP-PD on host: an issue of implementation only (fixable)
> and not in protocol or religious host vs router was (unfixable) ;-)
>
> -éric
>
>
> From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
> Date: jeudi 7 janvier 2016 13:46
> To: Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
> Cc: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>, Fred L Templin <
> Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] Routers are hosts too! (Re: I-D Action:
> draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-04.txt)
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Now, I respectfully disagree on the fact we have experience with host
>> doing DHCP-PD: for sure about Linux (and even it is user space) but what
>> about Windows? Or iOS (lowercase :-) )? Or ???
>>
>
> Windows has supported DHCPv6 since 2007:
> https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/teamdhcp/2007/01/23/dhcpv6-behaviour-in-windows-vista/
>
> As for iOS - two of the authors work for Apple, and both of them write
> code, so if they are saying that DHCPv6 PD is an option, I'd assume that
> it's possible to implement it on iOS :-)
>
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status