IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Routers are hosts too!

t.petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Fri, 08 January 2016 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0E11B2AC1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:07:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IS_RWM5ASxor for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:07:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1on0721.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe00::721]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60CCE1B2AC0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:07:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-btconnect-com; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=IcfuV7+oggAEfiTiN8sXBYglXMGUsL2yKBFNkj3vofo=; b=Ejqv/UZ9kJOP2G+rvwdPkpYCppuu3Ec8YLfbDsZScCc2+24cjb7ozmEO7669KI2GLJawwGIAntA1/UdGkWohQcDAAUK7WleI0+RCPnlqzkx/us196jwOuLU8649B4mPlsqR/8f5tsHv/OloW8Blk55BV03/rn9vhZV1o3hMFkEc=
Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ietfc@btconnect.com;
Received: from pc6 (86.185.87.133) by DBXPR07MB064.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.147.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.361.13; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 18:07:29 +0000
Message-ID: <007701d14a3f$16965100$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: nick@foobar.org, sthaug@nethelp.no
References: <67D93E4D-714A-4566-A308-D9EFBB71C43B@puck.nether.net> <CAHw9_iLbyU-YSJfvNH6zyJua4gJSg9TsLMAjGR2k-H-aA4hDSA@mail.gmail.com> <568FEA50.6000701@foobar.org> <20160108.181407.74727795.sthaug@nethelp.no>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 18:04:50 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [86.185.87.133]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DB4PR06CA0031.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (25.160.40.159) To DBXPR07MB064.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.147.24)
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; DBXPR07MB064; 2:cm/QgRZtZqO4roCXI3vrDKIsdLQmFhd4ig+I4bhbSvI/4AyhEX+pWkRDS48rkqLyrqi5j4mad7lTAVLm9oPE+bO0JDw6EJ0t0dQuWNnZrzhv0J9Dbm7W+OBSjgxRm4ZuVh5MOEia4nKYd7Ja2kIK5w==; 3:tMSG3BP/YmabHyHs/HWGFiPlskzx4b0kZP6UTFV5RGzN0l5or622oksiMJhVHPsubx91cmj7mlEdU3C3pyz6K88F5diMuisY8qITaPTxG6c9U8vOidj/vrXl9ERwCFDL; 25:JRpTZF8NETpFtJv68xGRBQj8N+WPzkHm7RMA2Z05MgLIcn1CujvlUFxIyPCBrezXuZnPhdnmEowtncJC34JyYnK3i1g63lQcLBpQlnO+wscn5cdbdmcin5NfDIlFEoMsb4+Xgr6xlCotoOknT7PW4KBPfI1ENyEwem/Iz0VsFSd5ICCcnEabvRcjmFStbyS0ZCdQHNGdb3w//bCF5y7KxB2PLsObqale8+3CZl3iAtIRUYJwnljfz8TZkcw9lVQv; 4:vU8gbKj6wb68yuS6mjSFGm9M3O1a4UDQGP3u7RfjNQ+0maYldyUTPcgWCXAKMK84asK9cXcdr+8+eA60D3ZeuQS2rpsB/n84B0SqlNFv7mWlE2V7as2GfcnHd17TK6yO/bAgrUWfpeiWm/lOmNKQ96hQfqida4poM65db6zF7KkWggnl8FTWOrYJD8gv+uX/0Bp/v5BpM2CkxgKOfSbKkJlNn1S59k9cJClWCRLIHzZRt8fGiKOqyHLGXCKTK34SIUMytbTaDqht+DiWWnlhiOcVmCbN1DGljBJ5/aJxFINaA3rPVGbWs0QDIfTNbzTx6i/nhX29UKgNZpvF8IinfrHeqCGn2xX34p3Q1xo/pXKoZt/oF+EQaWnTua+xpCi5
X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DBXPR07MB064;
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: c66df3c2-1cfb-4c60-3dd9-08d3185692c5
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <DBXPR07MB06477CDC7D8CCAC3D2B198CA0F60@DBXPR07MB064.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:;
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(520078)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001); SRVR:DBXPR07MB064; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DBXPR07MB064;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0815F8251E
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(199003)(13464003)(189002)(44736004)(5008740100001)(5001960100002)(77096005)(1456003)(23756003)(15975445007)(14496001)(6116002)(50466002)(44716002)(5001770100001)(76176999)(50986999)(230700001)(33646002)(93886004)(84392002)(87976001)(2906002)(81816999)(42186005)(66066001)(4326007)(189998001)(19580395003)(116806002)(105586002)(92566002)(62236002)(97736004)(86362001)(3846002)(226693001)(19580405001)(1556002)(50226001)(40100003)(47776003)(106356001)(101416001)(61296003)(81156007)(5004730100002)(1096002)(81686999)(122386002)(586003)(74416001)(7726001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DBXPR07MB064; H:pc6; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:0; MX:1; LANG:en;
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; DBXPR07MB064; 23: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
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; DBXPR07MB064; 5:/Irb+N2/w1dJgnHbLby6dkTA8QtRd+QjOouxVxClL+DIUMUb+v8LglSQbigb+G3vYKcUIVvJm2zZ/LnUkgyjhAoOOl554ychVjirgR3nDrPtaGfMBTl7tKFlPpsaQMLPewuqF6aFTfhq6aq6NXmiCg==; 24:zBlxnzJkshQVnzwZOta2XrG4aEFnnVFdL4IgkP9aSZ6FdPTXgWJojSdrJW332B0STKv4acDhWJj3jyMs7/hcqTJE5l1tDfi8/mSGrdy7/aE=
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:23
SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jan 2016 18:07:29.6153 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DBXPR07MB064
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/UgsP9gZEyfSj5xYzC5BWNEzFkGU>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Routers are hosts too!
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 18:07:54 -0000

----- Original Message -----
From: <sthaug@nethelp.no>
To: <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: <v6ops@ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 5:14 PM

> > > These are "devices", but possibly not "hosts"...
> >
> > this sounds like we're considering perfectly spherical ipv6 hosts in
a
> > vacuum.
>
> And continuing in this vein, pretty soon we'll assume a spherical cow
> of uniform density? :-)

I love the way that this thread was originally
'Focused Discussion'
and is now, well, the usual, focused, I suppose.

There is something about IPv6 that causes this to happen, and I suspect
that whatever it is is not conducive to the progress of either the IETF
or of the use of IPv6.  For myself, I have an existence proof, of the
non-existence of IPv6 in my own neck of the woods, and track this list
against the day when it exists and I have an interest.  If and when that
day comes, I might understand how it is that IPv6 Operations generates
more discussion with less apparent consensus than anything else I see in
the IETF, a process which I find more interesting than the technical
details of, say,  M and O, SLAAC, DHCPv6-PD etc- at least, at present.

Tom Petch

>
> Let's get back to discussing IPv6, though. Personally I would prefer
> if all "hosts" (servers, PCs, whatever) could simply use DHCPv6 PD and
> be done with it.
>
> Steinar Haug, AS2116
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email