Re: [v6ops] draft-pauly-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-update-01

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 30 March 2017 12:21 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224B3126B6E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 05:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sDv9d-YjipfJ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 05:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA9EC1294E4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 05:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id CE6DDA5; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:20:57 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1490876457; bh=TKF9FlFB+LN1aUcts8E1bqUup1RV4u2EkGYU6gVg/h8=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DK1pj3RPvkCxx4cbzfF3aMs2CQW5wNbscYLL+LKaNPbS4W0TBwPx4r4g5kjf9TuO7 pIBrAimHXA/FjJqgUbdZGZMxaq+o3ozG8ZqAB5DeVwDNsE7nZg39gXCm90hHCPTDxL cNDQBq+Em/TeFxNXBUE9G6x0orDdNt9D/Ub3wIdI=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7F0A4; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:20:57 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:20:57 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-7@u-1.phicoh.com>
cc: v6ops@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <m1ctYvJ-0000GSC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1703301418310.30226@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <CAD6AjGSxKftRXGfJ67rYN6Ccr961HMuU69Y=SSwnemvmsqddNQ@mail.gmail.com> <34A0BBC1-E9C9-4856-BBB5-F6A2B9F4C72F@consulintel.es> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1703300845190.30226@uplift.swm.pp.se> <m1ctWOM-0000IOC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1703301211140.30226@uplift.swm.pp.se> <m1ctYvJ-0000GSC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/PlOy8cLdJW9vj6WU5EvwqZlFcXg>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-pauly-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-update-01
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:21:01 -0000

On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Philip Homburg wrote:

> A host would have to probe every time it connects to a network for local 
> PMTU limitations. I wonder what the operational impact would be if every 
> host would start sending maximum sized packets to some well known 
> destination right after connecting to the network.

Well, I advocate to send lower MTU than 1500 in RA if you know that the 
upstream has lower than 1500 MTU. Otherwise you get a lot of useless PMTUD 
traffic from clients. Doing bidirectional MSS clamping makes sense as 
well, and I think some residential routers do this already.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se