Re: [v6ops] draft-pauly-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-update-01

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 30 March 2017 10:15 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11B8126CD8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 03:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hrsx7WADr_Is for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 03:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B7D2129530 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 03:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id AA6A2A5; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:14:58 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1490868898; bh=nflME1y29xct3iOqVJacK2wlvE2x9F5+p+Tvh/EFAfI=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xygmDweURZEkjSKk/dtsu/qwu8XrXhtK1eQWjh17apnmWj6DkOeRLV5DJ5uQPyohc uShcpLqKiCgKk8lLSmnTdUjvVxgysLZ7S5xiL/ztZ1yCTIUse2IZuDPMj8le1/1Mha 2KpPHcgFRdIGBM0zietgf0/ypEft/bwFHnTjOdqI=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92FC3A4; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:14:58 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:14:58 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-7@u-1.phicoh.com>
cc: v6ops@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <m1ctWOM-0000IOC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1703301211140.30226@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <CAD6AjGSxKftRXGfJ67rYN6Ccr961HMuU69Y=SSwnemvmsqddNQ@mail.gmail.com> <34A0BBC1-E9C9-4856-BBB5-F6A2B9F4C72F@consulintel.es> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1703300845190.30226@uplift.swm.pp.se> <m1ctWOM-0000IOC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/eIntP7hRlDMdrR6d7wCZw7YNWaI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-pauly-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-update-01
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:15:04 -0000

On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Philip Homburg wrote:

> It is hard to quantify, but in IPv4 lots of potential PMTU problems are 
> masked by MSS clamping.

Yes. I don't have data, but I have commonly talked to people in the 
business who are of the opinion that MSS clamping solves "all" problems.

When I point out that there are other protocols I typically get back that 
MSS clamping is good enough and solved all their customer complaints.

While I don't really like the approach, I think the pragmatic thing to do 
is to have the devices themselves have the ability to do PMTUD clamping if 
they have lots of problems that can be attributed to PMTUD, and then have 
this reported by means of diagnostics report to application/device vendor.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se