Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: New conference IPv6-mostly deployment
"Costello, Tom" <tcostello@anl.gov> Wed, 13 March 2024 20:51 UTC
Return-Path: <tcostello@anl.gov>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1ABC14F684 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_GOV_DKIM_AU=-0.999, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TRACKER_ID=0.1, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=anl.gov
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id btC4FHdXOuy9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:51:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GCC02-BL0-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl0gcc02on2072.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.89.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2359CC14F69A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=SnTe2BHeDO6GWVcsdOsBWBLq7Ry1oPSm2fRVoB6VzQa7CRogAEqrq7HZmEV8Il/6SnHnSEE0kRwAqiGk+E/ItumNxQ7ALDhwoweiIfpvYSfVn4wPw+alBJqinmC3dZmRRzlJrJzQJ/huYdJlH0jT7tnP4iF/gYT3GzD5zesjL0jdqNxvRlXuLLgD5y/FZkOZNEhKi+GmtNyTNe289Nsu33GGtOfeUKoKIZxcWVXLibnRYKWOj9RyaN29ZKF0bed2H/+a165vtVlQUnlM1PJeUew3FnL14/MWIiJq7ueDgf30Mvcei18v+2vKoV6hFVOy5XksFoUxvQjC0eM1Lu/T/w==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=5rzbBPOl6ecQZ3Y//UNGsz/JuvlZEo+8UTfzDvkpUZE=; b=W1gqgbFg9C+4NnDG9mBiScNyMVVMysbt+utTmDhcUUzIanBLYZKAlHxIu7JBV+ypkjEZz0IpYPoJytdfqhR6eUUPC2p10SqLoymoYPupCtmoPRahoe4DdCCHNhHSWhIUgb7QPI4y3TgPEeBQ7rHc+T6hqtjc+9no5NVeMhFzmxVymhCgKAIdVkrINxkRKAUe/yeekyD+F3y4wuJ+niqQw2MTWuCshHVj3QhxpFoXN4AxqO37JHmYw7MBuu6iUrR3hN1vm23fDySZdnTUE/NYgsLWlHcE2O07wu8PKvHQCtmucrJaITbB0CQlyhUca6zZaL8+y/qKg76Is6BtfU3J5g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=anl.gov; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=anl.gov; dkim=pass header.d=anl.gov; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=anl.gov; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=5rzbBPOl6ecQZ3Y//UNGsz/JuvlZEo+8UTfzDvkpUZE=; b=YIYvsrPjJIQtXT00Mzy792X/koCme+jRdF1XQcy0+nJhp3eaxR/o6WaPGXlyBI1L8Pxa+CV2pzn6VSMU93wTID+uluR1oswV7W7YJkjh4Ch/gUkzzfGHV2SMoDfHIklTlq2V88N7ocMQS/BbOFw3IXcXXEF7X8W2VZR5RsTAFqPlJfTasss0zvX6g1jAwMjfBSWeD/XTajGHBFYgBz1mbSn5487tPIOV734R8KIZy2JYvIIDQzIXNySnNkDIELlh7gD58B1CqSTBYhTOJ+Q79Rc1sU8kOZOyGMGhIFDgn0Mbl3QRbnyVlk5lnfenX8I++gS/WaavQ9ee8fcOZW/R6w==
Received: from DM6PR09MB5720.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:26d::23) by PH0PR09MB11424.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:2c3::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7386.19; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:51:07 +0000
Received: from DM6PR09MB5720.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5e0b:acab:499f:13da]) by DM6PR09MB5720.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5e0b:acab:499f:13da%7]) with mapi id 15.20.7386.017; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:51:07 +0000
From: "Costello, Tom" <tcostello@anl.gov>
To: Nick Buraglio <buraglio@forwardingplane.net>, Gabor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
CC: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: New conference IPv6-mostly deployment
Thread-Index: AQHadXnM/bOC1KC4TkiRJrqZfiQlC7E2CcMAgAABlQCAAA09gIAABMYAgAACQoCAAAJjAA==
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:51:07 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR09MB5720C88965930935A6327909BC2A2@DM6PR09MB5720.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CACMsEX9_SxHK-bJU5spyH1agPoWbQCP5fH38PYNOr6i1KKXEtQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALRKgT50XJwemdS4pk+fU6TD9rURMBAzu0vcZyWk9KZh9LuADQ@mail.gmail.com> <54eabd2e-b94d-4507-aa61-db91b17d766f@hit.bme.hu> <CACMsEX9o0p9PPb3GTXLiSMDyJXmm-37EjGzakFVOtv4tk4axGA@mail.gmail.com> <74d64acb-d700-4511-825b-8e650e83d495@hit.bme.hu> <CACMsEX9fwmOrO_dzqVq=i+uM-h6F7vXEHLR4H_SCe96nKV7_zA@mail.gmail.com> <42b686ec-e650-4d77-96ad-2b1ed28361ab@hit.bme.hu> <CACMsEX-qXKO1z07ZC4rACyg_PPTr++GHK098i37vk9w8XTUQMw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACMsEX-qXKO1z07ZC4rACyg_PPTr++GHK098i37vk9w8XTUQMw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=anl.gov;
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR09MB5720:EE_|PH0PR09MB11424:EE_
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: fd2faf27-8146-421a-45b2-08dc439f4e7c
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR09MB5720.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230031)(1800799015)(38070700009); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: l7CCQe2dG9VS4ZzpPxLoPJEZ7OWvjLnMlN8zbZaNiOK6ruhMQknkxSU403tAX4SxsazBIsjSaXy1clrIae78YBh+qNwqW47uvg6vcmomlU42bFtLnDY91HRAwWkEb4Tkq0CKBWA2D/uxpHb9G62icXeLoDgpXCjtGfoQ3Cf2wu5PFJab13uVqrgluo8afu1gm4psQQXTuE2sHZDw0oxL/YFN+9LmeeFwNPwKI9ZceZ3LPFEzqhL0Q2TZceF7qnNEm/JEPfF9r+MB8oxMe01Jx2g0Q9PmylJbxEPlReofkeYi6uTILxm0G5jfP8hemrvARJex9g51ZN53Z+/LbhRfsiO4ZTnPKKtamGxyEyUl+fvf3pEo5B+xSK7YUxuQbDr1GYCnZIDcqSB+qpx2bNYQVKUcncv0r4ObsZbCgUfsIQ/Mh7w+8dah+rmuvWFFvekNM/ExQN0djWU5qcxom4yWL+5YwjOxvaEADz+tdbu8XhoMV2UgR3mj79+nVh9EnFg3bwsGrX72Z8vIZsdxHaabvrWW/d8IKlLSqS5C7p1MXeScDJk6NbRhpDW+y5l6uYoMJ83ELirA+d0Sos6dccb0NhABAIpli8MGPUcxeMCJPPnNhh7PuGg7FEwlyqacJofeL8bCuY9HJyq13wVr5HczJXQCHln85osmsCGDJWahXJp3rv7YsrtuiKNV4FbXFXELGlC0ul9q17tEvaXDUm7a8ScxY5CyLZLViobXBwfyiiWJRWu+E1UBdwfYd/EPP/7H0zdfWxWAa94CJYSQCUzksi2x1t0Ao5koJD/j/Y2udqTdILN79u+jeJg7ZSA3EaAp3AMiTzRggY8wE02aCO5hN/qGu6rP3utkebESX7tuA6dKHImszA+r7piHsb0cpPMnLAdtC1Behj94JfmHxqak+xBr/190tRYkU0iHRzX0idiXvYlpmBeuxattkVEw0I10omlYjFIkU745S5PdNHH5VZYkf+exA56vpv3HdNiBjsd9vqdkjbwpmye5B9u4lfNJfunMZo9pFKy5J2BwYqjMIeQ8s4DTfd+fV029c1gaDe9bfKvqYhU5CHUrRMJTHlglbD5H0tVRf0ozdTIucRJiwMOF0m/OkUU57NchtnA0yf2g5A1xRhou2WL9Ge3SKCIQSz1vW6aht8sVsSn8YVhG+yDqlhjtLnD+og+zejipoKtBMeKFpHnIGLvKhum+DKYW7WXNtowCwLbp+IpewCjTklKN4okhisIFRmayhZmRu1z5uyO1Wyzwqufavsu+FKrs01ldNcW5k1nBFdBXnSukhM48JrtYxHGMv/YOeVVaE+35vwMLvwPrJ7ILaFamQCJ42Fg/UE6YDJo0FIzT1Kg1kcvgd+X4J0jbGH+X3qAmqN0ATOw0m9+X3L5POySTZM9RId7+ISGtgNA/uk8VUficSTzyg+aqWz1JQoj91UMq66i9NUi3CTFcb/JGnYe8q5Tcp52GgAQI9OgVR1TI7n5KhfKzwsPzug/FRwjnEyDcPn6ivMqREemlKrnhEaeFu3o3awYg8jAlvRyVHJRZ3femwoyqkejDVATXLt/ZsPCru5mDFTbGHaMIo8f+7aW5ZavlUKxgi9orSUrfI+uDT22uib9e9BL40D9El9BNO++VZEqyIK8daCrPH/I5jlibQgfJ
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM6PR09MB5720C88965930935A6327909BC2A2DM6PR09MB5720namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: anl.gov
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM6PR09MB5720.namprd09.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: fd2faf27-8146-421a-45b2-08dc439f4e7c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Mar 2024 20:51:07.5384 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 0cfca185-25f7-49e3-8ae7-704d5326e285
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PH0PR09MB11424
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/bmGYa-GB7Z8kBZP2D-FGgBPx5b8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: New conference IPv6-mostly deployment
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:51:15 -0000
Hi Nick, We used bind for DNS64 at SC23, I was not aware of "Benchmarking DNS64 Implementations: Theory and Practice" prior to this email and will be reviewing that soon as it might sway us towards unbound for SC24. Thanks, Tom From: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Nick Buraglio Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2024 15:30 To: Gabor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu> Cc: v6ops@ietf.org WG <v6ops@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: New conference IPv6-mostly deployment That's definitely good info. At work we've done testing with unbound, bind and one other one that I can't recall. I believe we ended up with bind in our data centers for DNS64 simply due to more institutional knowledge. My office ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd That's definitely good info. At work we've done testing with unbound, bind and one other one that I can't recall. I believe we ended up with bind in our data centers for DNS64 simply due to more institutional knowledge. My office runs v6-only using unbound. I believe Tom Costello used unbound on the supercomputing 24 network, but I may be misremembering (he can chime in and correct me as he's on the list). nb On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 3:22 PM Gabor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu<mailto:lencse@hit.bme.hu>> wrote: Hi Nick, On 3/13/2024 9:05 PM, Nick Buraglio wrote: DNS64 is currently done using unbound, but it has changed and may change again or perhaps add more options to gain more experience. According to my measurements, Unbond is the best choice in terms of performance. I benchmarked PowerDNS, Unbound and BIND in 2017 and found that Unbound had the highest performance when using 1-8 active CPU cores, PowerDNS showed the best scalability with the number of active CPU cores, and BIND was inferior in both metrics. If you are interested in the details, you can find them is our (green open access) paper, just click on the link below: G. Lencse and Y. Kadobayashi, "Benchmarking DNS64 Implementations: Theory and Practice", Computer Communications (Elsevier), vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 61-74, September 1, 2018, DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2018.05.005 Review version in PDF<https://urldefense.us/v3/__http:/www.hit.bme.hu/*lencse/publications/ECC-2018-DNS64-BM-for-review.pdf__;fg!!G_uCfscf7eWS!cxYxcgjKaRNK3YsmWoKG0bYYICaKP1nXqTHh7ns7iwooK0FMKfc-dfCM00FYYsV34FXSfPo_sEmG3QO0sfTd9DZ_mQ$> (Their most relevant performance results are in Tables V, VI, and VII.) Best regards, Gábor _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops<https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!cxYxcgjKaRNK3YsmWoKG0bYYICaKP1nXqTHh7ns7iwooK0FMKfc-dfCM00FYYsV34FXSfPo_sEmG3QO0sfQmdWFsQg$>
- [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Henri Alves de Godoy
- [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: New … Gabor LENCSE
- Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: … Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: … Gabor LENCSE
- Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: … Henri Alves de Godoy
- Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: … Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: … Gabor LENCSE
- Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: … Nick Buraglio
- [v6ops] DNS64 -- Re: No recent progress of jool.m… Gabor LENCSE
- Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: … Costello, Tom
- Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: … Gabor LENCSE
- Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: … Jason Healy
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Henri Alves de Godoy
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian Candler
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Henri Alves de Godoy
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Daryll Swer
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Gyan Mishra
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Gyan Mishra
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Ondřej Caletka
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian Candler
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian Candler
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian Candler
- [v6ops] scalability of DNS64 and stateful NAT64 i… Gabor LENCSE
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian Candler
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Henri Alves de Godoy
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian Candler
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Daryll Swer
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian Candler
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian Candler
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Henri Alves de Godoy