Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: New conference IPv6-mostly deployment
Nick Buraglio <buraglio@forwardingplane.net> Wed, 13 March 2024 20:05 UTC
Return-Path: <buraglio@forwardingplane.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB08C1E9CAB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=forwardingplane.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4FaymW5o_Qit for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C479C14F74E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-42a029c8e76so1188241cf.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=forwardingplane.net; s=google; t=1710360328; x=1710965128; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KISvo49Dm7mdCZA6EG6cdkMEqiV143/LRbYjtAnVAT4=; b=LO2AfXUUoj3x4e2hc2sX563ruuH9g8lJyeJy2VMB6sxpJE4fb7PiRtGZQ8gNsJYkbr ghvZiu4cpSYJY6Qgp66IbK3L/pdl2rBsnb1ngd3aW4DNtq80O8R5Tgxas/k3IU6wPG71 tZwZ4Fbwwwwex2b4J2vSLdO7a0q1PRMq3EJLc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710360328; x=1710965128; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=KISvo49Dm7mdCZA6EG6cdkMEqiV143/LRbYjtAnVAT4=; b=e53vZcs3pd6o7s4eP+mx0CC9Aj4sbmsys9qiyPnYQLNabbTG160fCjZUai+BaMUb5o GoEuvZePbtWFsu6ZrN2nW5rvtftXiKdkNCyTOux8tqoByOiurFwQNv1sSrVveQZFDTMX /rrI6AZIqB5ByrDCHDRHhHNGOcY19vAVzB0/T0AEzY9iHfvxFXN5PDenvR5QUfZyS/Ww 9qWpdev3Bnl3zWU1mvXgtBUormV1L+5zpbEApEPGfCi5tpZNRbqzQ/LZy7k6wCbEDlI1 ABSLRFeut1V8dMRyZCyZ0sVbh+dDpwocheWSDM7N4wV5g8NUbM1e6w2B/QMVTdWe83ku 6YuA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxovkrfKZVnVMRKo5FjF4b5c2DhFtDtBnMiBORTkNuE6oOAcTDF 82c5xrCj5WQqWR20JP0L75f9Bze4cnu5LWKEKsbz1w0SAtnr+NH4pnIvAN8BKgSsx6y02+3nOop Xm4L11n6xL5PSLf6l+m4qZTU9bMdajCWHrXUF0d+GRgJ+qq0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEJrnON3n/jwajfuoQ3KFvZLZQ9Ao2K5MkkM6BRoZe1XwVEehnfDL0itsAFGKFdTvCpSH+iyXPnNgULFHZojzM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:8a:b0:42f:3075:3e09 with SMTP id o10-20020a05622a008a00b0042f30753e09mr8212436qtw.4.1710360328035; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACMsEX9_SxHK-bJU5spyH1agPoWbQCP5fH38PYNOr6i1KKXEtQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALRKgT50XJwemdS4pk+fU6TD9rURMBAzu0vcZyWk9KZh9LuADQ@mail.gmail.com> <54eabd2e-b94d-4507-aa61-db91b17d766f@hit.bme.hu> <CACMsEX9o0p9PPb3GTXLiSMDyJXmm-37EjGzakFVOtv4tk4axGA@mail.gmail.com> <74d64acb-d700-4511-825b-8e650e83d495@hit.bme.hu>
In-Reply-To: <74d64acb-d700-4511-825b-8e650e83d495@hit.bme.hu>
From: Nick Buraglio <buraglio@forwardingplane.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:05:17 -0500
Message-ID: <CACMsEX9fwmOrO_dzqVq=i+uM-h6F7vXEHLR4H_SCe96nKV7_zA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gabor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ca80a00613904be8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/x8AaaO4Mo5QgvU7P2UIxkZHc3_4>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: New conference IPv6-mostly deployment
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:05:34 -0000
DNS64 is currently done using unbound, but it has changed and may change again or perhaps add more options to gain more experience. nb On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 2:18 PM Gabor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu> wrote: > Hi Nick, > On 3/13/2024 8:12 PM, Nick Buraglio wrote: > > +1 to jool.mx. I recently set up three semi-public public IPv6 > NAT64/DNS64 systems for folks to test with, all three using jool. If folks > are interested in testing out NAT64/DNS64 and want to try them out let me > know off-list and I'll provide info. > > I would be interested, which DNS64 implementation you use. (If it is not a > secret.) > > Best regards, > > Gábor > > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops >
- [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Henri Alves de Godoy
- [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: New … Gabor LENCSE
- Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: … Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: … Gabor LENCSE
- Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: … Henri Alves de Godoy
- Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: … Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: … Gabor LENCSE
- Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: … Nick Buraglio
- [v6ops] DNS64 -- Re: No recent progress of jool.m… Gabor LENCSE
- Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: … Costello, Tom
- Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: … Gabor LENCSE
- Re: [v6ops] No recent progress of jool.mx -- Re: … Jason Healy
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Henri Alves de Godoy
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian Candler
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Henri Alves de Godoy
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Daryll Swer
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Gyan Mishra
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Gyan Mishra
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Ondřej Caletka
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian Candler
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian Candler
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian Candler
- [v6ops] scalability of DNS64 and stateful NAT64 i… Gabor LENCSE
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian Candler
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Henri Alves de Godoy
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian Candler
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Daryll Swer
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian Candler
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Brian Candler
- Re: [v6ops] New conference IPv6-mostly deployment Henri Alves de Godoy