IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [Int-area] Still need to know what has changed.... Re: IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> Fri, 25 September 2020 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B40A3A0921; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 13:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c3hEKyonwrUk; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 13:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR04-VI1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092075102.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.75.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A47D53A090D; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 13:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=h/Z293C7GEMxo7lnEG7AVpuufbjyajea/Q3mbaQzrdPrAgTLjSzVbkY+ypINFnDUgOvaP8JMZ+HCRzsaDLG0tb9Xyxk9awbKzdZOTACJeCxfRebhSa8QAnC+ucgKI+F9JCHWKz960zO29E28bae599sgVsnUh446lMdePUK2TDaEN29yEFVQs85IvKktgaTycvFtY4P/A24hYK2g4sKmJ0fjckjFvlehkxCThQ3KK16cpXnrnO/krQ4qWDPwkqBKVBEnag7lRM3v7wKYrIzvC8jXrXs2V22zY3KSqks5P1H5LiRPJNIJ6elVMl9SGINIKsHZXFjkAGM+y7E6NEppig==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=vnfV4XprcpQsY2HZTBnMuTaounzjZtw4aRZ5VUHHXms=; b=gTfqN5+5e9MzuP2zfAGI4OJuDluepGEKxHgf4xyn/ll74lyp8yW0HlNacn2VbvdXmlUtZMhvgF3jW5NkENUhd88ptabdZfB8sjjcHwOJmf+SbO4A8pqbhcqgfWe93/a1HevY0pmWYi49Fx2X48cWd6KRm7DwGIT7zXtmN9LiSunWP6X+3GRFDmHg6v+4w5jJiFgIF8C2KfizJOAUmiVhOMWjlrDr7DAxPI8hit7NTj3yYhlxZ4Ucyg9FffbqQb8KRPKymw2ll03CgEg2NuaFBcogwjh2kRpaOe99motKKiPEPssgBdltyJK4YcEfKKWHsXumscZj7z2ISBM5BCFgLQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=vnfV4XprcpQsY2HZTBnMuTaounzjZtw4aRZ5VUHHXms=; b=pRdBvIIsEw2ZtvvWxK88WdPaMgFRPnR4H7reC0g+45jzeWSpU2sV0UIuu2mLwJ6jOV78waCzbxiI5XPuisTCNQtJiprGYbHgKgVp1ByX9DlGmHRhygRBMwi2vuDs3Gm+VZm1jM8V23hrAhvr0MYqwhdZZ/8SgvIJRSZI8BWjw07U1RmBB/9yaMUWt1XDYMoGRz/GkDfTAUAsf8yPqaQ01PDGe4lXCyrGSSplE+6LuWzKNerFRn+CQvDikQ4CxKW3kSHiKfqJKnB+DqQw6cMQ+XvVTh3zy4smU6eGKjL0LtIN4QtPds12MdIbz2aB/aoIVYYPXEPt0+z6dy3/r9ET5w==
Received: from VI1EUR04FT057.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e0e::47) by VI1EUR04HT091.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e0e::79) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3412.21; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 20:52:45 +0000
Received: from VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2a01:111:e400:7e0e::52) by VI1EUR04FT057.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e0e::274) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3412.21 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 20:52:45 +0000
Received: from VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::89f6:7540:e834:ffb8]) by VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::89f6:7540:e834:ffb8%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3412.024; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 20:52:45 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
To: Juan Carlos Zuniga <juancarlos.zuniga@sigfox.com>, Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com>
CC: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, int-area <int-area@ietf.org>, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, Juan Carlos Zuniga <j.c.zuniga@ieee.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] Still need to know what has changed.... Re: IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)
Thread-Index: AQHWjSq/zPsJZ7YUikO21h6CIi8HxqltUlfwgADfGYCAACCn4IACRiUAgAAC6BCAAc3/gIAAiCMQgAVsNYCAAAKo8IABfzcAgAABDwA=
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 20:52:45 +0000
Message-ID: <VI1P194MB02853349DCA641AEA2B8F028AE360@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <VI1P194MB0285F47132384AC7C0D8A8DCAE3C0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <F2516A37-06B1-44FC-850F-307114B7D6A5@gmail.com> <VI1P194MB0285B8AE9ACE88D1AF051ADAAE3A0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <601FB9F8-DB83-4654-B652-BE07C49F7918@gmail.com> <VI1P194MB0285D67301646D4383320B55AE390@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <DB6PR0801MB2117338E86198AF76F76AF8D89360@DB6PR0801MB2117.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB6PR0801MB2117338E86198AF76F76AF8D89360@DB6PR0801MB2117.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:C0AA974594DD832854C8EED95CA5961B1BCE310398E55577BB4CE2B2EDA2CDFF; UpperCasedChecksum:445981061E78E1E575FF8FD7194240D2D0E0BED790F260EBD683C8CD444D077E; SizeAsReceived:7779; Count:44
x-tmn: [zNbCMA+WGdtfjYHU/INCxVxyTBU8RpWH]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 44
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f9af10ec-914d-4bac-df81-08d86194f442
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VI1EUR04HT091:
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: v7zJ8te2whT/e4tS8qG+q2XQ3ra10D7s4B69XJdnRO804kAtWoi7FD/KFb7gBkIKfqr2MRMJyctu9/7iHk1CA6xUbr330ScSiI3TFnb8mH4sc2NKjaa+c8ifOTOW8GI9Kq0ACius8TI4fLFOX/wdFLnVvoJuFg/QOygbQw05Am06LBLRr9C32MJWdu5fl4gs7MiDMKmpXRHqhcfWWMy9BQ==
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: DL6V4/n/+Zr0HSgNG7EcfwTh9BuptyZSwXLFyXS0iH+Xb9CVSJ913rvOVWC7yFr9FameWg5/GrxJ1x/ZIrLCrp3cw7U4Iew3Fjo60i/TTFXM/Kar/hXHRNNXbyoIhXXz2QoX1sLz8cR/p8uavjuluA==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: VI1EUR04FT057.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f9af10ec-914d-4bac-df81-08d86194f442
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Sep 2020 20:52:45.2803 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1EUR04HT091
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/cruOqUg3-aOvaVHR14ngQVRVs40>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [Int-area] Still need to know what has changed.... Re: IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 20:52:50 -0000

I still don't see any technical concerns received from the members, all are to understand the way how IPv10 works, some had a misunderstanding that’s why I wanted to answer all these question during the meeting so no duplicated questions be received.

It is good to take all into my account but regarding the running code, is out of my hands, so without your help, nothing will go forward.

Thanks Juan,

Khaled Omar

-----Original Message-----
From: Juan Carlos Zuniga <juancarlos.zuniga@sigfox.com> 
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 10:46 PM
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>; Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com>
Cc: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>; int-area <int-area@ietf.org>; Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>; Juan Carlos Zuniga <j.c.zuniga@ieee.org>
Subject: RE: [Int-area] Still need to know what has changed.... Re: IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

> 
> So, let me ask Eric if we can reserve a slot in the next meeting to 
> present IPv10.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Khaled Omar
> 

Khaled,

You have received significant feedback from representatives of network/cloud operators, network equipment vendors, mobile device makers, academia, SW providers and developers. 

We will not consider your draft for presentation until a version of your proposal responds to the different technical issues that have been pointed out.

If you are interested in pursuing, please update your draft taking into account all these considerations. Running code with proven results would also help.

Once you get positive support on the mailing list, we will gladly consider it for presentation at the meeting.

Best regards,

Juan Carlos Zuniga & Wassim Haddad
(Internet Area WG Chairs)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email