Re: [v6ops] My read of the data

To close since it's monday the 29th discussion indicates that the below
drafts:

	draft-carpenter-v4v6tran-framework

	draft-wing-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-ipv6

	draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis with edits from
	draft-herbst-v6ops-cpeenhancements

	draft-livingood-dns-whitelisting-implications

plus

	draft-troan-multihoming-without-nat66

were not controversial as working groups documents.

consesus remains divided on the value of

	draft-sarikaya-v6ops-prefix-delegation

as a WG document, suggestions for improvement or advancement along an
alternative track if desired should be made.

If there's any-other input on this subject please post it now, or
consider the subject closed for the time-being.

thanks.

joel

On 11/20/10 11:12 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
> The documents that I gather the working groups wants to accept as working group documents (>60%) are:
> 
> Consider this a "hum". Do you buy this?
> 
> 	draft-carpenter-v4v6tran-framework
> 	draft-wing-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-ipv6
> 	draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis with edits from draft-herbst-v6ops-cpeenhancements
> 	draft-livingood-dns-whitelisting-implications
> 
> Could do mine too, but I plan to let it die unless people realy want it. The important ones are happy eyeballs, the test I took to bmwg, and Gont's RFC
> 
> The chairs will take the rest of the drafts up with their respective authors to decide on the appropriate way forward.
> 
> I will be on vacation this week and therefore slow. Expect me on email after 29 November.
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 