IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] My read of the data

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Sat, 20 November 2010 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFC628C0E0 for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:11:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.387
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.387 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.212, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qv70j0YjVpQa for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:11:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C5F3A6A0B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:11:37 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAMas50yrR7H+/2dsb2JhbACiZXGfcJpfhUsEhFqGBIMO
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,229,1288569600"; d="scan'208";a="289824950"
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Nov 2010 19:12:21 +0000
Received: from Freds-Computer.local (sjc-vpn6-1231.cisco.com [10.21.124.207]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oAKJCGvO028668 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 19:12:21 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by Freds-Computer.local (PGP Universal service); Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:12:21 -0800
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Freds-Computer.local on Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:12:21 -0800
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:12:07 -0800
Message-Id: <F9BB4F42-376F-4AD3-A195-F45AFA52CB15@cisco.com>
To: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [v6ops] My read of the data
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 19:11:45 -0000

The documents that I gather the working groups wants to accept as working group documents (>60%) are:

Consider this a "hum". Do you buy this?

	draft-carpenter-v4v6tran-framework
	draft-wing-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-ipv6
	draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis with edits from draft-herbst-v6ops-cpeenhancements
	draft-livingood-dns-whitelisting-implications

Could do mine too, but I plan to let it die unless people realy want it. The important ones are happy eyeballs, the test I took to bmwg, and Gont's RFC

The chairs will take the rest of the drafts up with their respective authors to decide on the appropriate way forward.

I will be on vacation this week and therefore slow. Expect me on email after 29 November.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email