IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] My read of the data

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 22 November 2010 01:48 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E1D28C0FC for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:48:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.117
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.117 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.118, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gyWbMmdejC+J for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:48:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF57728C105 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:48:49 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AigDANpa6UyrR7H+/2dsb2JhbACUEY5DcaBAmXaFSwSEWoYEgw4
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,232,1288569600"; d="scan'208";a="290138449"
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2010 01:49:44 +0000
Received: from Freds-Computer.local (sjc-vpn4-1521.cisco.com [10.21.85.240]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oAM1nTZP027587; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 01:49:44 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by Freds-Computer.local (PGP Universal service); Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:49:44 -0800
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Freds-Computer.local on Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:49:44 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <005401cb89e0$401097e0$2e626e0a@china.huawei.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:49:44 -0800
Message-Id: <69AA5B1E-A388-4C80-8AE0-196D8C8BF8DF@cisco.com>
References: <005401cb89e0$401097e0$2e626e0a@china.huawei.com>
To: Sheng Jiang <shengjiang@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: 'IPv6 Ops WG' <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] My read of the data
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 01:48:51 -0000

Sorry, you're correct. Missed that.

On Nov 21, 2010, at 4:57 PM, Sheng Jiang wrote:

> I am support to adopt these four drafts. But what happen to draft-troan-multihoming-without-nat66?
> From the data, 76.0% support it. Have the chairs decided to move it somewhere else or just a miss?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Sheng
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] 
>> On Behalf Of Fred Baker
>> Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 3:12 AM
>> To: IPv6 Ops WG
>> Subject: [v6ops] My read of the data
>> 
>> The documents that I gather the working groups wants to 
>> accept as working group documents (>60%) are:
>> 
>> Consider this a "hum". Do you buy this?
>> 
>> 	draft-carpenter-v4v6tran-framework
>> 	draft-wing-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-ipv6
>> 	draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis with edits from 
>> draft-herbst-v6ops-cpeenhancements
>> 	draft-livingood-dns-whitelisting-implications
>> 
>> Could do mine too, but I plan to let it die unless people 
>> realy want it. The important ones are happy eyeballs, the 
>> test I took to bmwg, and Gont's RFC
>> 
>> The chairs will take the rest of the drafts up with their 
>> respective authors to decide on the appropriate way forward.
>> 
>> I will be on vacation this week and therefore slow. Expect me 
>> on email after 29 November.
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email