IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] control and security of DHCP

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 14 January 2014 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183561ADF90 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:52:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.916
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.916 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VoqZVT9eB0sE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:52:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22c.google.com (mail-ie0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53B61ADF8F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:52:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id e14so747781iej.17 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:52:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=5eHOoCIsoZ2P6S/LXq7C+Id0vBk+FaY+B9iXVTiZgV0=; b=Ge3/GraO3weYYRVyw8pJvjMDSEkhk/RRzzKfsBMbVl3TFBzwVxhJSRsltUTGYsjcfV 1adwOetacRCPCNylshYugkvwxeSjyYOJMbYEo2O+3L+WaaFOx0xOMcXFOlTKlu2I8Zja p/Iuyl34JHldPUL4593SHbnRbelXO4dkU3xzICHsPfwQLJ9iWJvzR8Se501s8wABLCoE jBiUIzsG3A1tgF5Ztq113Lj7doqKuOyUfHglM2JReJ/oH0LPAZpcALHC1kLUepkTri4Z uTz73rijIbFSV30+XH9tjDvtS/yzzAeWsii0gtaRFsrcatKUWnAmlQICF+CNMjU0hJ8X DwsQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=5eHOoCIsoZ2P6S/LXq7C+Id0vBk+FaY+B9iXVTiZgV0=; b=kZSJKtEVPaJBPgC6N5p2ie0mD4tJ1vJNGDaEwieJWKBdEkWbs4RtAptDHZBN4694Vw jkmDitTfgj8wBEpOk1ylDR6LGWeuqo3rGDAapMlthKICax3/fnzURRtX6NJaEZZaWP2N vPYHTta65Y1PM+FkluUL2mCQFM2hNSgQPeQqhZlbIel/wdkFyVVW+AaI9QjIe1lx9En4 4mTU0aCoymanfyIkAFcjSZLbC6fTIQ3GBTxeMLhuBkiJe9pJQJJwFkdIBmW1PS/6sCa5 JkJDHkKcMhmiuRBiwQ9IC8CmWXemOIVgeKJSBGMVcT67T2oEtpDcwIJn7d7XWIOGDYCa nHPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnpuZ29E12vpQNpe3jrQq5fsx7HkJPMSZb/ROH+7KxRj1XAIJSgPjyEAXeWLID3XAplwwOQFgEnDP9523Lt/lncWySHDw7NLfd+aLk+H8PF1bXnSEDo4nyKjjf2xbedvsJnGpxzUoL1WRgot3NUavw9xW4NvaYWC4t//ZIhfAD9PeS3rGXcLqXWmRfvXaejTM3B1Khg
X-Received: by 10.50.61.101 with SMTP id o5mr4614238igr.31.1389725541974; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:52:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.7.36 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:52:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52D58413.3050506@foobar.org>
References: <1808340F7EC362469DDFFB112B37E2FCDA31A30EB1@SRVHKE02.rdm.cz> <52CFB8D5.70900@gmail.com> <B54D5283-8880-434A-A3C0-9BFF0081E13B@gmail.com> <20140110.124610.74672987.sthaug@nethelp.no> <60C5513D-B8DA-48D6-82D3-53E148F9F7BA@gmail.com> <52D0157D.6040009@foobar.org> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1401101651580.20074@uplift.swm.pp.se> <D1FC3C0B-CC5D-44BC-B753-2F1BD94A48FA@nominum.com> <CAKD1Yr1C0jRNq-ta=HeGFusC8VFGGg1ffDFLoroUoiHmX-KYiA@mail.gmail.com> <52D18F22.1070708@foobar.org> <CAKD1Yr2PrG_Rit2YCAkep4_-LUSqNpEU-t+ttRsLPpSbYVLoig@mail.gmail.com> <1389490607.51957.YahooMailNeo@web161904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <52D2A8EF.2040901@foobar.org> <52D4E794.3070109@globis.net> <52D57214.1070505@foobar.org> <52D57DC5.9080603@globis.net> <52D58413.3050506@foobar.org>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 03:52:01 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2WMzfi0_s34h4Q2EiQp=YFor78hsUiB8fVbGMyojEU1Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1136035043ee7c04eff2b1fa"
Cc: Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] control and security of DHCP
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 18:52:35 -0000

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:

> > So what security are you suggesting to deploy to ensure that your set up
> > remains sufficiently isolated between customers, even though they share a
> > L2 LAN?
>
> Right now?  I have nothing.  I can't deploy ipv6 without holes large enough
> to drive trucks through.
>

You can't give every customer their own /64?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email