IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] control and security of DHCP

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Tue, 14 January 2014 17:21 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7501AE139 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 09:21:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jOFQ5aa17eSt for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 09:21:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173C11AE0DC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 09:21:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Envelope-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from cupcake.foobar.org ([IPv6:2001:4d68:2002:100::126]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0EHLORW040393 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:21:25 GMT (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.netability.ie: Host [IPv6:2001:4d68:2002:100::126] claimed to be cupcake.foobar.org
Message-ID: <52D57214.1070505@foobar.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:21:24 +0000
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net>
References: <1808340F7EC362469DDFFB112B37E2FCDA31A30EB1@SRVHKE02.rdm.cz> <52CFB8D5.70900@gmail.com> <B54D5283-8880-434A-A3C0-9BFF0081E13B@gmail.com> <20140110.124610.74672987.sthaug@nethelp.no> <60C5513D-B8DA-48D6-82D3-53E148F9F7BA@gmail.com> <52D0157D.6040009@foobar.org> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1401101651580.20074@uplift.swm.pp.se> <D1FC3C0B-CC5D-44BC-B753-2F1BD94A48FA@nominum.com> <CAKD1Yr1C0jRNq-ta=HeGFusC8VFGGg1ffDFLoroUoiHmX-KYiA@mail.gmail.com> <52D18F22.1070708@foobar.org> <CAKD1Yr2PrG_Rit2YCAkep4_-LUSqNpEU-t+ttRsLPpSbYVLoig@mail.gmail.com> <1389490607.51957.YahooMailNeo@web161904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <52D2A8EF.2040901@foobar.org> <52D4E794.3070109@globis.net>
In-Reply-To: <52D4E794.3070109@globis.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] control and security of DHCP
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:21:44 -0000

On 14/01/2014 07:30, Ray Hunter wrote:
> Would the combination: IPv6/64 + L2 PVLAN + DHCPv6 setting the address  +

private vlans are troublesome, to say the least.  In a virtualised
environment, you need multi-switch support for specific types of pvlans.
This places vendor restrictions on the types of kit you need to deploy.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email