IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Comments on 464xlat-00

Washam Fan <washam.fan@gmail.com> Sun, 12 February 2012 05:33 UTC

Return-Path: <washam.fan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998C121F85A4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:33:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nhTgbhhgaroV for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:33:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46A121F8571 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:33:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wgbdt10 with SMTP id dt10so2925078wgb.13 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:33:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=eeWhf3MoTvrEobmQy+SuzohPJFYi9QNlc9rtgJkWdaU=; b=QVIteV0uKa2KxcCQEHZ74tnw3nkdP9N3VTJTzA2rkP+VCLIr5yLXd4gNUTCCoZKCQl 3OihXmPrQBcWCYz8eSPPlJsVaujVf+TBnordWqdFWbT4XYnELwCgx9Oq6ei+DeMBJ8Wh Dx4bIcKA7nxUkHXa95rOtB4P0x/uPyoaVFyqU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.82.227 with SMTP id l3mr17724604wiy.1.1329024785663; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:33:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.1.6 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:33:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20120211011714kawashimam@mail.jp.nec.com>
References: <CAAuHL_ABqoyHNuFKA3xMik7cvU+XiB50+W56+z_MG6RHHvLa-w@mail.gmail.com> <20120211011714kawashimam@mail.jp.nec.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:33:05 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAuHL_Brs8g4pBTG1PHSioQO2D-RbabbGYHtX=Qr+Vk7U1_S9Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Washam Fan <washam.fan@gmail.com>
To: Masanobu Kawashima <kawashimam@vx.jp.nec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Comments on 464xlat-00
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:33:10 -0000

Hi Masanobu,

> If CLAT gets a prefix longer than /64, it does not need to perform ND
> for 464XLAT addresses on WAN interface because 464XLAT addresses are
> assigned to LAN interface or Virtual interface in CLAT. (i.e. 464XLAT
> addresses are not included in WAN Prefix.)
>
> If CLAT gets a prefix shorter than /64, it must perform ND for 464XLAT
> addresses on WAN interface because 464XLAT addresses are assigned to
> WAN interface. (i.e. 464XLAT addresses are included in WAN Prefix.)

But the draft says if CLAT get a prefix *equals to* /64, it MUST
perform ND. Anyway, I think more text in section is necessary.

Thanks,
washam

> Moreover, if CLAT gets a prefix shorter than /96, it can not perform
> CLAT function.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email