IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] Comments on 464xlat-00

Washam Fan <washam.fan@gmail.com> Tue, 07 February 2012 06:01 UTC

Return-Path: <washam.fan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7428721F871D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 22:01:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oYLKAfgLJSZj for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 22:01:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577D621F858E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 22:01:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wgbdt10 with SMTP id dt10so5075913wgb.13 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:01:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=5in0Ge741uuyn99SA/sqH5edNVyR/P2QZeVAFFwy5i0=; b=fy0++mw4CLYwpV82KQQPeLw7FFZ8FPJJCY5+tGUZQ/ybnqqWlz4LnLTH9dXyWsqHgB umbadH+gNYMiHdBVck0u2LivwlzBsmpL6CYTbY0JHhXq6JzL0k63ABLA/8X/Eujl5lWh 9TiIWvT669f/+kXq4nyp6cZtrKXYMg1toVbUc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.82.227 with SMTP id l3mr30074098wiy.1.1328594479545; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:01:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.1.6 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 22:01:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:01:19 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAuHL_DTVi6JpadEpYafui+2KhEcq78x3ckC3ebDMo5Dt7x4bA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Washam Fan <washam.fan@gmail.com>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [v6ops] Comments on 464xlat-00
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:01:21 -0000

Hi,

I generally support this work. But have several comments below.

1. section 7.4 mentioned DNS proxy for both IPv4 and IPv6 hosts, i
don't know why DNS proxy for IPv6 hosts is needed.

2. I think the author should elaborate on what the configuration
function is like in section 7.6

3. i don't know what is the meaning for the text under section 7.5. I
think NDP should always perform while SLAAC perform only if the prefix
equals to 64.

4. I don't know if the draft should cover the host1-CLAT1-CLAT2-host2
communication case.

Thanks,
washam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email