IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-troan-v6ops-6to4-update

Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-2@u-1.phicoh.com> Fri, 12 August 2011 12:30 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-b29AA871B@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B493221F8747 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 05:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.505
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.505 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.094, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S883AIuqi7sm for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 05:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo-6to4.hq.phicoh.net [IPv6:2002:8225:f03:10:2a0:c9ff:fe9f:17a9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E968C21F8752 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 05:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (Smail #66) id m1Qrqt5-0001iqC; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:30:55 +0200
Message-Id: <m1Qrqt5-0001iqC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: fred@cisco.com
From: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-2@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-b29AA871B@u-1.phicoh.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:55:01 -0700 (PDT) ." <201108111355.p7BDt1G05082@ftpeng-update.cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:30:36 +0200
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, draft-troan-v6ops-6to4-update@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-troan-v6ops-6to4-update
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:30:27 -0000

In your letter dated Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:55:01 -0700 (PDT) you wrote:
>A new draft has been posted, at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-troan-v6ops-6
>to4-update. Please take a look at it and comment.

I guess it can't hurt to say that 6to4 must be off by default.

Then the draft proceeds to disucss address selection. And that's a bit 
curious. The text there is already covered by 3484bis. But the draft is
strangely silent about whether to prefer an IPv4 connection over a 
connection between two 6to4 addresses. (This is also covered in 3484bis,
so that text should at least refer to 3484bis)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email