IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-troan-v6ops-6to4-update

Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com> Thu, 11 August 2011 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094E221F8BA4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.151, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pmHejwHDv9sr for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47EFA21F8B65 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwe5 with SMTP id 5so4247356wwe.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=qJDZGg0y/rom5yXsxoeTVJEf32Nivn5lBGFIm7e8u2U=; b=kA/j4v/775qa9UQXEE6azTXTlQOBMk6w1LABOY6mKsVEbe0DOr6L4KtVW1/fH1cy2P AM3ymNcN/93FZCFtChgX5abx7NhALCVG9Q42PJevM94lXqgX0vlGBnCp1yn6ojnAAkF0 468HTAxf3E+kCn5Lhq4SO9TbCo2aI9AAnUQZI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.168.193 with SMTP id k43mr7145336wel.95.1313079171229; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.185.11 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201108111355.p7BDt1G05082@ftpeng-update.cisco.com>
References: <201108111355.p7BDt1G05082@ftpeng-update.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:12:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGR71CT-M3ZvSSeBuKZWUz=Svc6X=XgLO0NQZBasHsh-cw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: fred@cisco.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, draft-troan-v6ops-6to4-update@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-troan-v6ops-6to4-update
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:12:18 -0000

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 6:55 AM,  <fred@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> A new draft has been posted, at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-troan-v6ops-6to4-update. Please take a look at it and comment.
>

Is there a need for this to be standards track or even a working group document?

I strongly feel the IETF has spent too much time on this and any more
time is waste of effort.

RFC6343 is good enough.

Cameron

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email