Re: [v6ops] Agenda discussion

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 06 March 2012 04:59 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E5421E8096 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 20:59:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -108.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.850, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11m0TdwtPbwQ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 20:59:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bgl-iport-2.cisco.com (bgl-iport-2.cisco.com [72.163.197.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F2121E8091 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 20:59:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=2888; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1331009967; x=1332219567; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:message-id: references:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RuXPd1GuoxdX7Oxb8lIW5HMwnNdQ+XPHCiSI/OXBnWM=; b=M37vkXsakC0CLK/hpjrnpIfhSeVLcgY72q6TvevqeE7vnDQcYQ4Rwo1z +rVkXn9D9Kb2VLpBqjp1E/8LQ87U/ycIapjII1SJH6lHa8ju+0IOeZYDE mgI8PqrhXcjO4KnbJxfDw2rEQ7kN+Mzi5Uo32UBDzMXHzN0W0VpVYiiNh U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap4EADeZVU9Io8UY/2dsb2JhbABDtXKBfQEBAQMBAQEBCwQBJysJEAsLRicwBhMUDodgBQuaEwGfBY97YwSIToxwhWOKM4Jy
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,538,1325462400"; d="scan'208";a="7176879"
Received: from vla196-nat.cisco.com (HELO bgl-core-4.cisco.com) ([72.163.197.24]) by bgl-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2012 04:59:25 +0000
Received: from Freds-Computer.local (tky-vpn-client-230-217.cisco.com [10.70.230.217]) by bgl-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q264xOAb013143 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 04:59:25 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by Freds-Computer.local (PGP Universal service); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:59:25 +0900
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Freds-Computer.local on Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:59:25 +0900
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <25E067CE-65BF-462E-9A45-2D09451256F9@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:59:11 +0900
Message-Id: <CC367441-56F6-4282-8660-1268F4BBC04D@cisco.com>
References: <25E067CE-65BF-462E-9A45-2D09451256F9@cisco.com>
To: v6ops v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Agenda discussion
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 04:59:28 -0000

Downloading the new drafts, I observe three new ones:

-rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred  10823 Mar  5 17:46 draft-ma-v6ops-terminal-test-00.txt
-rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred  18058 Mar  6 08:44 draft-gundavelli-v6ops-community-wifi-svcs-00.txt
-rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred  21172 Mar  6 10:08 draft-lopez-v6ops-dc-ipv6-00.txt

(the date/time stamp reflects the fact that I'm in Japan and therefore a day ahead)

In each case, I will be looking for list traffic related to them as my cue for agenda time. Authors, please provoke list traffic...


On Mar 6, 2012, at 1:46 PM, Fred Baker wrote:

> Stated in no particular order, we have the following documents that meet these criteria:
>  - not in the IESG process somewhere
>  - posted or updated since IETF 82
>  - have had list discussion since IETF 82 or responds to discussion at IETF 82
> 
> At this point, I take them as our agenda at IETF 83. If I am missing a document (if you have posted it since Sunday, I may well be missing it), please remind me.
> 
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance
>  "IPv6 Guidance for Internet Content and Application Service Providers",
>  Brian Carpenter, Sheng Jiang, 22-Feb-12
> 
> No presentation expected, but the authors would like working group adoption. We need to decide whether we want to do that.
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-v6ops-label-balance
>  "Using the IPv6 Flow Label for Server Load Balancing", Brian Carpenter,
>  Sheng Jiang, Willy Tarreau, 17-Jan-12
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat
>  "464XLAT: Combination of Stateful and Stateless Translation", Masataka
>  Mawatari, Masanobu Kawashima, Cameron Byrne, 14-Feb-12
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
>  "Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers", Barbara Stark,
>  Chris Donley, Hemant Singh, Ole Troan, Wes Beebee, 22-Dec-11
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address
>  "Stateless Source Address Mapping for ICMPv6 Packets", Xing Li, Congxiao
>  Bao, Dan Wing, Ramji Vaithianathan, Geoff Huston, 24-Feb-12
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation
>  "Implementation Advice for IPv6 Router Advertisement Guard (RA-Guard)",
>  Fernando Gont, 3-Mar-12
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-wireline-incremental-ipv6
>  "Wireline Incremental IPv6", Victor Kuarsingh, Lee Howard, 1-Feb-12
> 
> In the coming week, I am told to expect one additional -00 draft, and I could imagine other drafts being updated. I will be looking for those drafts to meet the criteria above as well, but please drop the chairs a note.
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops