Re: [v6ops] Call For Adoption: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment

Gabor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu> Fri, 11 June 2021 12:37 UTC

Return-Path: <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301423A361E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 05:37:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gH8F5RUkWOj0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 05:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frogstar.hit.bme.hu (frogstar.hit.bme.hu [IPv6:2001:738:2001:4020::2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CAB73A35F2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 05:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.145] (host-79-121-43-72.kabelnet.hu [79.121.43.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by frogstar.hit.bme.hu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 15BCbFIA034200 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 14:37:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lencse@hit.bme.hu)
X-Authentication-Warning: frogstar.hit.bme.hu: Host host-79-121-43-72.kabelnet.hu [79.121.43.72] claimed to be [192.168.1.145]
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <BL0PR05MB5316B21F3D035339CEE892F0AE3D9@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <7211c26d-5fe4-cf8a-f24a-afd9bb09eb64@foobar.org> <4668_1623392252_60C2FFFC_4668_93_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330353A88FB@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CABNhwV2m-pRpibd5K=eAx93prtzBE7oKePoDGe4TBOMz7BLVRQ@mail.gmail.com> <19625_1623394618_60C3093A_19625_189_14_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330353A8939@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Gabor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
Message-ID: <f41f0110-5ad2-1751-5f99-4033a35c014b@hit.bme.hu>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 14:37:11 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <19625_1623394618_60C3093A_19625_189_14_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330353A8939@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------F3D17A3DE41559721796064F"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at frogstar.hit.bme.hu
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Received-SPF: pass (frogstar.hit.bme.hu: authenticated connection) receiver=frogstar.hit.bme.hu; client-ip=79.121.43.72; helo=[192.168.1.145]; envelope-from=lencse@hit.bme.hu; x-software=spfmilter 2.001 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2-1.2.10;
X-DCC-wuwien-Metrics: frogstar.hit.bme.hu; whitelist
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 152.66.248.44
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/nJCfaEB2Qpf6zahUfBSluKiQj7I>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Call For Adoption: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 12:37:34 -0000

Hi Med, All,

On 6/11/2021 8:56 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
[...]
>
>  This can be for example to develop methods in bmwg for better 
> assessing performance.
>
To that end, our draft titled "Benchmarking Methodology for Stateful 
NATxy Gateways using RFC 4814 Pseudorandom Port Numbers"  ( 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lencse-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful 
) is now under discussion at the BMWG mailing list.

Any comments are welcome!

Best regards,

Gábor