Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-loops WGLC

Hi Joel,

That's a good idea about filing an errata - the thought
hadn't occurred to me, so thanks for mentioning it.

Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel Jaeggli [mailto:joelja@bogus.com] 
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 10:13 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: Fred Baker; v6ops@ietf.org; v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org; 
> Ron Bonica
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-loops WGLC
> 
> Seems like an application for an errata, if it indeed is simply an
> implmentation pitfall. the informational document should not 
> be wrongly
> be assumed to depricate any part of 5214 since it doesn't claim that
> from outset.
> 
> I'd prefer that we continue the last call with the document 
> that we have
> given this also in the form that has cleared the iesg once already.
> 
> On 4/4/11 2:08 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> > Hi Fred,
> >  
> > It may seem unusual for an author to comment on their own document,
> > however in the case of ISATAP at least I am concerned that this new
> > version may encourage router vendors to build products that do not
> > provide necessary support for legacy hosts.
> >  
> > In particular, I have come to understand that legacy ISATAP hosts
> > depend on the router advertising non-link-local IPv6 prefixes on its
> > ISATAP interface. If a router vendor were to read the 
> recommendations
> > in this new version of the document, however, they might incorrectly
> > conclude that the use of non-link-local IPv6 prefixes on ISATAP
> > interfaces should be deprecated.
> >  
> > This seems like something that could be corrected with the addition
> > of 1-2 sentences. How would you like to proceed?
> >  
> > Thanks - Fred
> > 
> >     
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> >     *From:* v6ops-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] *On
> >     Behalf Of *Fred Baker
> >     *Sent:* Thursday, March 31, 2011 2:30 AM
> >     *To:* v6ops@ietf.org
> >     *Cc:* v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org; Ron Bonica
> >     *Subject:* [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-loops WGLC
> > 
> >     This is to initiate a one week working group last call of
> >     draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-loops; it will close a week 
> from Friday. The
> >     IESG reviewed the document and asked for changes; we 
> need to be sure
> >     we are comfortable with the changes. The diff from the 
> version sent
> >     to the IESG last November is at http://tinyurl.com/6dhowhf
> > 
> >     Please read it now. If you find nits (spelling errors, minor
> >     suggested wording changes, etc), comment to the 
> authors; if you find
> >     greater issues, such as disagreeing with a statement or finding
> >     additional issues that need to be addressed, please post your
> >     comments to the list.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > v6ops mailing list
> > v6ops@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 
> 