IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Disposition of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 02 November 2020 06:28 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B513A0DEF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 22:28:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ibl1p5IFKL8E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 22:28:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x435.google.com (mail-pf1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF8923A0DEE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 22:28:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x435.google.com with SMTP id w65so10215885pfd.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 22:28:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=clMyG4Cnr4+Q2XE/DEnpVBxgkXgLHyeBmGbgwklobXM=; b=o4PBvT92ldB6zrAluhETu6tOpoZqzNuEutkSenDoLrSZI6p8yYYUtWvPuTiECalCE4 VZdgUBc24LWNXkZ5BvmWa88rjPLjiiOfTOwXKxj7lqWnpbQoLoobr1yzWMuTKLDj5srJ KooJprQiqH8HV/756ZEoLvSYOJyknDqZP4GQOUBLS2HLbhb2c+0QynFMfPWEdc2TxzUU 3lwgkvpUC/mMTMCFTmGHcT5CvfD4VsHncZqa+/7QRgPfLFMrEaQQexK74zkUcSOADIEV LXext+vQEtNAlS2fr5QXJLuoVwpJ4iOEqRidVUu6b5glJOx1Xz/UF6l+l/JX43O6vQ0H QvNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=clMyG4Cnr4+Q2XE/DEnpVBxgkXgLHyeBmGbgwklobXM=; b=DvyrvFzvHTFf482c7JnxB/78dAeeA+VcfchFpsyWIoaVYkxxQz2jDTK6NdUrNl5IEx OW2LspHroFfI5oI6EqpzHEN0k+MvmW/E/wWV8MzzKGHWCfNG82jchex6KwxH94RMlzXc KGZcZChi499ecITl+CyOmAJuVkKn1+1P//vBicVRb0w5AQ5hbs3xfzbBqMvsNMFhO9Bo ipgz2RE9aLhID3lYeXGwwxewYc1gXF4s11fFWMQ/+mUom9m43ICNQFFjyDJX7GKE1NfH nfXPeqGzIiC73NkwoC7WmoBtEvhUcPjyMwfujv1HRqTw7BP0W2D1KphgvZF8/Rd2UoHc rrpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5323YqCD9n5Sjedoy7tn6vnbTg87KgCv/zI1qlojl4uwVMwGx8iP NVNR/AsDlTumjE5BsTTjZbRa8ILT3BUvEg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwMZjgMEFTtpvRusXZ9O4aS6F5eTlylXZUNhX17J8433ThHHKAop8B/8sjsHrpRfs2uQzQvLQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:6883:0:b029:163:ee70:1e59 with SMTP id d125-20020a6268830000b0290163ee701e59mr20320989pfc.5.1604298537076; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 22:28:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5800:1963::1004? ([2600:8802:5800:1963::1004]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b67sm12609041pfa.151.2020.11.01.22.28.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 01 Nov 2020 22:28:56 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.20.0.2.1\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a16a6fbf-e6a8-83e6-895a-9cf00421dbb8@si6networks.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2020 22:28:55 -0800
Cc: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8777D157-7721-45B5-ADAE-483E340EDF6D@gmail.com>
References: <CAHw9_iKr2HF4iZYfDWXTqi59HHKcv3UzpLST7VB_rook3MZMWA@mail.gmail.com> <46512217-610D-4CD4-A3F4-D7589D537A54@employees.org> <a16a6fbf-e6a8-83e6-895a-9cf00421dbb8@si6networks.com>
To: Ole Trøan <otroan@employees.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.20.0.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/r1DLo_RbAY-M_ILnQT9-EE_K7DM>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Disposition of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 06:28:59 -0000


> On Oct 22, 2020, at 1:28 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> 
>> If the IESG doesn't want this published in it's current form I would
>> prefer it was sent back to the wg for a respin.
> 
> A respin for what?

Let me echo Fernando's question. Warren (and the IESG) are essentially asking for a respin that can be carried out by the RFC Editor, which is a pretty minor change. I'm willing enough to take this back to the working group, do the respin, and resubmit, which I suspect Alice/Sandy/ et al might prefer. But the question is - is there anything that needs to be touched besides the issues raised in the ballot (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum/ballot/)? What specifically do you want edited, and in what way?

I would kind of hope that if you had a major issue, you might have raised it since November 2019.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email