Re: [v6ops] Disposition of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05
Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Thu, 22 October 2020 20:28 UTC
Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CDD3A0ECB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.342
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.342 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B3sGDj3UooqZ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4::14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D67B03A0ECA for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2800:810:464:b9c:3814:f192:8491:1ea] (unknown [IPv6:2800:810:464:b9c:3814:f192:8491:1ea]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1696B280285; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:28:21 +0000 (UTC)
To: otroan@employees.org, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
References: <CAHw9_iKr2HF4iZYfDWXTqi59HHKcv3UzpLST7VB_rook3MZMWA@mail.gmail.com> <46512217-610D-4CD4-A3F4-D7589D537A54@employees.org>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <a16a6fbf-e6a8-83e6-895a-9cf00421dbb8@si6networks.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 17:28:10 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <46512217-610D-4CD4-A3F4-D7589D537A54@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/xVv4f73kB8tRFag3yJCBAraXwXk>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Disposition of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:28:38 -0000
Hi, Ole, On 22/10/20 16:24, otroan@employees.org wrote: > I object. Both to s/Informational/BCP and to the change of 2119 > language. > > This document is part of a series, 6204, 7084, which are more like > procurement documents than protocol specifications. I don't see how this document (or 6204 or 7084) can be seen as procurement documents. Actually, they pretty much look like protocol specifications, and in many cases could even be protocol specs. For example, I just opened one random document from the list you provided, and looked at some random text. Found this: WPD-7: If the IPv6 CE router requests both an IA_NA and an IA_PD option in DHCPv6, it MUST accept an IA_PD option in DHCPv6 Advertise/Reply messages, even if the message does not contain any addresses. This kind of thing could easily be part of the DHCPv6 spec. So I fail to see why you argue that these look like procurement documents. That said, this present document is not part of any series (or well, only part of the *slaac-renum* series). So I'm not sure why a decision on this document should consider whatever discussion was had, at a different point in time, on other documents. [...] > If the IESG doesn't want this published in it's current form I would > prefer it was sent back to the wg for a respin. A respin for what? Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
- [v6ops] Disposition of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac… Warren Kumari
- Re: [v6ops] Disposition of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-s… otroan
- Re: [v6ops] Disposition of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-s… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Disposition of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-s… Fred Baker
- [v6ops] Pretty Please? - Disposition of draft-iet… Warren Kumari
- Re: [v6ops] Pretty Please? - Disposition of draft… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Pretty Please? - Disposition of draft… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Pretty Please? - Disposition of draft… Alejandro D'Egidio
- Re: [v6ops] Pretty Please? - Disposition of draft… Keith Moore
- Re: [v6ops] Pretty Please? - Disposition of draft… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Pretty Please? - Disposition of draft… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [v6ops] Pretty Please? - Disposition of draft… Warren Kumari
- Re: [v6ops] Pretty Please? - Disposition of draft… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Disposition of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-s… Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Disposition of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-s… Fernando Gont
- [v6ops] Fwd: Disposition of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-… Fred Baker