IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] Fwd: Disposition of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 27 January 2021 23:55 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E789B3A0DDC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:55:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2UWWCP1kO75q for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:55:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F5263A0DD7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:55:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id gx1so2811701pjb.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:55:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:to; bh=Uj/64U4EEZOm1GlkXaiD2/gpHy1StmcTxBMGY1odLag=; b=dRmoxy4u11A5VRhMjVr8DrzuXM9TcI/PHT0ppuwmhe3XDtznbYKYrGt5iOI47k00EV mHGL+SMvcXZIXwVQlBP+qHum68w+KQz5JGXuZx8XsdLQRxrgXYjB7OIsLsgmcv9Bd0C8 AWBFP9PB1lrfKf2iq7L/upxJq7fG/MoeNYOR65adMjuAyLxEao+BabUQxykqyn9cQ5XY 6U+6Qy9Z4jJ5i7HV2G+hz4JH8qH4tFJJCNaZqozKTTpkebnHgGD+46B002LkECA1QP1B eVUB2nZD3Inx4ImnDsdfk9eNkSYVfprUCSHFKH4keoCClAb9ZrOTsJDzQsMnzJ5k20v8 u5LA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:to; bh=Uj/64U4EEZOm1GlkXaiD2/gpHy1StmcTxBMGY1odLag=; b=mUEVLnDrtOlSmyzsAt4xNv9LAvDX+C5wyLH9uPnj480TE1Wx9Xc456LMyZOX4p1arM F1bSz+kBeazC9WBif5YSEwoAbme9D8oZTN4S7jram1/S23ylxrzRSDWx1a9WgcooVeoM mjDnTvQgRP4vdoR1Hy1eWg6ylcW3jFWk1XoUZoWBQUjomP3vx5pvT6nOvEy+SVXOwaqV o009/J01QEhHOK7PNXcRM0GM6Va+X4LCjHrJj0wbFD+2KC4E0i2PF61RcBh6mTG19GUH 4gOkrE5t2CtE+e+ArqnZ5ZFqDtxkXHgqR/8EJkPaSZb/XBFvw9ka6mS4N6dPD0YZUUmp DUSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dLeQe5yVN7g3uKd24t0e+pkMuKGbob7yWmL7fCCEmZFkfZB0L 5Y1sIjIoEQGxr5v581syiN7xzquEWVQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwojIKhU7mLNBbCmcH+v+GziiZjBM1QAne5XOytlW2tcNOOlMYpbQ1meC3IRhXnjkEUY84ZQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4005:: with SMTP id ie5mr8406137pjb.104.1611791732235; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:55:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:648:8200:dd20:c150:3bf2:f39f:5244? ([2601:648:8200:dd20:c150:3bf2:f39f:5244]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c5sm3472829pfi.5.2021.01.27.15.55.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:55:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Fred Baker <FredBaker.IETF@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-A92B8EE0-DD4E-4E22-A7CC-195191280098"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:55:30 -0800
Message-Id: <9E421F9D-3D1D-4481-AC3B-3FC74FB76612@gmail.com>
References: <BL0PR05MB53162455614EC580E88C8306AEBB9@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (18D52)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/s1NPDs_3hreWHm3Ivzie2n67Rr4>
Subject: [v6ops] Fwd: Disposition of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 23:55:34 -0000

My error. The WGLC call I thought had happened and I started this morning in fact has happened. My error. So we’re closing that WGLC (which had expired), and asking the IESG to continue processing the draft as a BCP.

Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
> Date: January 27, 2021 at 10:07:18 AM PST
> To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
> Subject: RE: Disposition of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05
> 
> It happened between December 17 and 29.
> 
>                                                          Ron
> 
> 
> 
> Juniper Business Use Only
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 10:54 AM
> To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
> Subject: Re: Disposition of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05
> 
> 
> 
>> On Dec 17, 2020, at 7:56 AM, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Didn't Warren say that we need another WGLC if we stay with BCP?
> 
> He did, and I thought that happened. Looking up the mail, however, I guess it didn't. So I'll ask the list.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email