Re: [v6ops] MTUs on the general Internet

sthaug@nethelp.no Thu, 04 December 2014 10:18 UTC

Return-Path: <sthaug@nethelp.no>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BC91A0119 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 02:18:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HHtKKTZtD-7n for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 02:18:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AD8A1A0146 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 02:18:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 35297 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2014 10:18:20 -0000
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (HELO localhost) (195.1.209.33) by bizet.nethelp.no with SMTP; 4 Dec 2014 10:18:20 -0000
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:18:20 +0100
Message-Id: <20141204.111820.41660320.sthaug@nethelp.no>
To: jeroen@massar.ch
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <54802E1D.9070401@massar.ch>
References: <547F3CE8.4090302@massar.ch> <20141204.095809.74726281.sthaug@nethelp.no> <54802E1D.9070401@massar.ch>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/sfh1k1BXZyblnJMViZ0TwfvuObk
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] MTUs on the general Internet
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:18:24 -0000

> The primary thing I think though that one can take away from those
> numbers is that people do not really care about MTU and that they are
> mostly fine with 1280. There is then also no real perceived benefit for
> them as long as their stuff is 'fast'.

"People" as in residential users may not really care about MTU as long
as their Facebook and Youtube works.

I can assure you that our business users *do* care: 1500 byte MTU (or
more) is a *hard* requirement for a lot of the contracts we bid on
("hard" meaning: If we didn't offer at least 1500 byte MTU, we would
automatically be excluded from that bid).

Thus we have concluded that it's far simpler to just offer 1500 bytes
to all customers. Note that we don't use PPPoE except for a few limited
circumstances.

Steinar Haug, AS 2116