IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: But are we talking IPv6 only? That's how I read the draft. (Re: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03)

james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com> Wed, 27 August 2008 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD6E28C1A4 for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0jHMXzRkxCJd for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0898A28C0E1 for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KYQRV-0003EI-V7 for v6ops-data@psg.com; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:12:33 +0000
Received: from [17.254.13.22] (helo=mail-out3.apple.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <jhw@apple.com>) id 1KYQRR-0003Dk-UR for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:12:32 +0000
Received: from relay14.apple.com (relay14.apple.com [17.128.113.52]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF38F3881D3E; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay14.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay14.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id A6D76280A3; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11807134-aad65bb000000ece-14-48b5a71c9e56
Received: from il0602f-dhcp90.apple.com (il0602f-dhcp90.apple.com [17.206.50.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay14.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 867C32809F; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Message-Id: <CD947C45-58F7-47F1-807F-A276490B1E39@apple.com>
From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
To: Mark Smith <ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080827194713.23271bd1.ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1)
Subject: Re: But are we talking IPv6 only? That's how I read the draft. (Re: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:12:28 -0700
References: <20080824204553.08131c65.ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org> <48B1CCE8.1070305@gmail.com> <01af01c9065b$b4602440$c2f0200a@cisco.com> <48B23391.1090503@gmail.com> <01cd01c90672$a57c8790$c2f0200a@cisco.com> <48B31DA3.6080001@gmail.com> <07d201c906f7$50a85e30$c2f0200a@cisco.com> <48B32B43.5010103@gmail.com> <084c01c906fe$f9bf1840$c2f0200a@cisco.com> <48B33430.40704@gmail.com> <A31EB889-2BD9-4283-A408-AB6DCC1D568A@suspicious.org> <08be01c90712$d876cd40$c2f0200a@cisco.com> <20080827194713.23271bd1.ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

On Aug 27, 2008, at 03:17, Mark Smith wrote:
> * Native IPv6 CPE security, plus IPv4 security/functionality
> requirements to support IPv6 transition via IPv4 tunnelling

It was my understanding that this is the proper scope, not the  
alternatives you mentioned.


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, communications engineering

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email