Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-colitti-v6ops-host-addr-availability

Hello authors,

+1 and thanks for the draft!

Since you mentioned 3GPP, maybe it would be useful to mention Broadband
Forum (BBF) as well? BBF End-to-End Architecture technical reports
recommend the following:

1. TR-177 - IPv6 in the context of TR-101 (Nov 2010)
1.1 - Addressing recommendations - paragraph 4.2:
"From  a  routed  RG  perspective,  the  following  IPv6  addresses  may
be  provided  by  the  Service
Provider’s network:
- A /64 prefix for the WAN link GUA (optional, only done in the case of the
numbered WAN
model)
- A  delegated  prefix  for  use  within  the  home  network  (mandatory).
The  Broadband  Forum
suggests  a  size  for  the  delegated  prefix  of  at  least  a  /60  for
home  network  or  SOHO
environments,  with  a  recommended  prefix  length  of  /56.  The
delegated  prefix  may  be
extended to a /48 for larger organizations."

1.2 - IPv6 Prefix Delegation (DHCPv6-PD) - paragraph 4.2.1:
"A different prefix (with a maximum length of 64 bits, and a recommended
length of 56 bits) is
delegated per access loop".

2. TR-187 issue 2 - IPv6 for PPP Broadband Access (Feb 2013)
DHCPv6-PD is a mandatory requirement and it must be supported together with
DHCPv6 /128 WAN address assignment. Here is a few BNG requirements -
chapter 9.1:
"R-22    The BNG, when acting as DHCPv6 Server, MUST be able to assign a
single IPv6 /128
    address to the WAN interface of the RG when using DHCPv6 for address
assignment.
R-23    The  BNG MUST  be  able  to  support  DHCPv6-Prefix  Delegation,
RFC  3633 [16],
    to delegate a prefix to the RG."

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 4:47 AM, <fred@cisco.com> wrote:

> A new draft has been posted, at
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-colitti-v6ops-host-addr-availability.
> Please take a look at it and comment.
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

-- 
Best regards,
Yury.