IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Multicast problem in IPv6 address management

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 12 August 2020 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5855C3A0744 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oWRO3LVlwUQu for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-f54.google.com (mail-qv1-f54.google.com [209.85.219.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 917393A058F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-f54.google.com with SMTP id o2so1376512qvk.6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=CSDHkzM3epBUAo/cVimEAOWKQLcTFtT9z4kZx60BiUA=; b=m01NWgTWEQZIkVrLIU9TcQBzwhtHBVEnKKYCDd+rRKrx6Wlt8C9/tMDOjVFwODYMrq Wqk3zOyJWhsTkqXCCFmy1m0xdH7PSf4TvZFFZUWk2JF6+5puyv+Z3PO9Z3jc1g61Rq/V je61ZXRY/Ij/RcaAVB/AmgQ9In5cDsaASIAWKOP/g7RjxhTJgpwWoom1wCiTSgg4zzvC ZLMXlL2RH8r3o0mU84IdWKXxxptbezwQq6w1JPnLkUCKgzCpRYAdPmjkXHcDzeonGjEa zpjFV+ht0zVQf2qFIOkIUeVu1HylJ66lC4UyhQMCM9ez9PHnDzpVQnass59CbRCZgFBV VnNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=CSDHkzM3epBUAo/cVimEAOWKQLcTFtT9z4kZx60BiUA=; b=tO4+r7qk949tlsJKjqf1XqEQ+1ZbLUlc5cQMFxp80/7Dv5hgKZSO+sZx+12uian1nN J79fk8BCvc6JQEvgOOU0lLX2Yi4UrkJCF6N8Gh1Czoe3GEV25peC4ctohEXBji6rsRrK QRn6W48TizVv0pxiIybkKZiImnWS7EOF6KZ6qwkbYNcYrrP0nt/v7sgUBh/qXqgC8kKs 1bN+5TUVPL0+qHCzkFxABxfkGwEfGrf09BURxi9MOtRDH2UtUSKy+kcQ8N0RhYU2CxOd EFjA2ZFfVROJwx/1NGdudYQzCtApXhyxClZStfVAVodplCh6NTdw29v1A39tNAcj73Up R6xw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532pAqdH5zj8Dqq16f1SIsUhllMTCWi+Cx/6ytgZ4aN9yaOv20T/ 4ISW/A+o8SOdwdTvovbcs8hCLg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7UNs0l5b/YgdbmOLSOKkvXz8c022FWGy56IYCIgDwUgUqNwVXSWlydREYUk6Oxt6zze7toQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:b312:: with SMTP id s18mr688278qve.34.1597252851485; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([2601:18b:300:36ee:8c0:28c2:ea2e:2e58]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o187sm2674352qkf.14.2020.08.12.10.20.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <8A5E629F-BBEE-489B-9EC4-DFAE09EFA58D@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3CB32232-EE66-423A-9905-7012AD4E5459"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3652.0.5.2.1\))
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 13:20:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: <16fca7281aa143aeadc8ca985fa44294@huawei.com>
Cc: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
To: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
References: <54d926767ff14e6d98a034f525e5521f@huawei.com> <8B672A3B-0917-46FE-B00C-13DCD7059F7A@strayalpha.com> <16fca7281aa143aeadc8ca985fa44294@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3652.0.5.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/tx7Wyz_YLkTLWR3zJgfpVqcRxz8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Multicast problem in IPv6 address management
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:20:55 -0000

On Aug 12, 2020, at 1:15 PM, Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com> wrote:
> But multicast packet (without beam forming) could not penetrate the wall in principle (common case for 5Ghz). 100% loss guarantied.

This is a case for turning multicast into successive unicast.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email