IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Inviting discussion: draft-chen-v6ops-nfv-ipv6

"STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> Fri, 20 February 2015 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <bs7652@att.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9E21A8750 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 06:22:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MOsGeFNo0yqk for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 06:22:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com [209.65.160.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EA631A8759 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 06:22:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.23] (EHLO alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.4-5) with ESMTP id d1347e45.2b4bdde62940.2944802.00-2453.8330888.nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (envelope-from <bs7652@att.com>); Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:22:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 54e7431d18f2077b-a6ffe0b1fd1800061e2c1bd7ed28263bcbfd40c5
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.23] (EHLO alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.4-5) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id c0347e45.0.2944652.00-2182.8330471.nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (envelope-from <bs7652@att.com>); Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:22:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 54e7430f21ee46c6-15e5b57a5237e23655f25d34cee11898bfa04d5f
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1KEM4Eb000786; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:22:04 -0500
Received: from alpi133.aldc.att.com (alpi133.aldc.att.com [130.8.217.3]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1KELw4O000711 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:21:59 -0500
Received: from GAALPA1MSGHUBAG.ITServices.sbc.com (GAALPA1MSGHUBAG.itservices.sbc.com [130.8.218.156]) by alpi133.aldc.att.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:21:50 GMT
Received: from GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.126]) by GAALPA1MSGHUBAG.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.8.218.156]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:21:50 -0500
From: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
To: "'Fred Baker (fred)'" <fred@cisco.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Inviting discussion: draft-chen-v6ops-nfv-ipv6
Thread-Index: AdBMhkOVK+jx9zhxQgW7jsjoc/yHpwAkNMaQ
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:21:49 +0000
Message-ID: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61130F30325@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B0612B38A@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B0612B38A@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.61.166.72]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=V6DKJ5bi c=1 sm=1 a=VXHOiMMwGAwA+y4G3/O+aw==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=vKzWRVGcsRAA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=zQP]
X-AnalysisOut: [7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32RAAAA:8 a=0HtSIViG9nkA:10 a=48vgC7mUA]
X-AnalysisOut: [AAA:8 a=VTtYgNpgYSHxIbz5scsA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=HSP8-D6]
X-AnalysisOut: [_OhjEB8UZ:21 a=w1dAibhA7juTv4pi:21]
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <bs7652@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.23]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/vQP1_T1YvN8i5n5yftoJrlne3eo>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Inviting discussion: draft-chen-v6ops-nfv-ipv6
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:22:24 -0000

Hi Fred,
I did talk to Hui Deng about this draft while in Hawaii. There was off-line feedback from me and others in my company. My main comment was that driving operator requirements into OpenStack code is best done in OPNFV. I don't think IETF is the right place to do OpenStack-specific design.

If there were to be a presentation in Dallas, I would prefer for there to be a new revision that incorporated changes from received comments.
Barbara

> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker (fred)
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 3:55 PM
> To: v6ops@ietf.org
> Subject: [v6ops] Inviting discussion: draft-chen-v6ops-nfv-ipv6
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chen-v6ops-nfv-ipv6
>   "IPv6 Considerations for Network Function Virtualization (NFV)", Gang
>   Chen, Hui Deng, 2014-10-27
> 
> This draft was prepared for IETF 91, but didn't get discussed in part because a
> number of Chinese participants didn't make it to Honolulu for a Monday
> meeting. Is there interest in discussing it at IETF 92?
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email