IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis WGLC

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Wed, 02 December 2015 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A89F1AD0EA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 08:09:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tniqV_dur2DX for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 08:09:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-nor36.orange.com [80.12.70.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8A8D1AC3CF for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 08:09:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfednr00.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.64]) by opfednr22.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id EC0432077F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 17:09:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.66]) by opfednr00.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 24E471A01B9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:57:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541]) by OPEXCLILMA1.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::95e2:eb4b:3053:fabf%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:57:05 +0100
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis WGLC
Thread-Index: AdEq2Dx5SGv4nT8WRX6YRd+6UpCuFAApMpiQAGcDUMA=
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 15:57:05 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933008CA56ED@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <201511291900.tATJ04fK009754@irp-lnx1.cisco.com> <88CAA5385EB5404392BF93106C8C53F8AED5357036@HE111507.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
In-Reply-To: <88CAA5385EB5404392BF93106C8C53F8AED5357036@HE111507.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.5]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/x6EcbO70EZEfAV989t4A5HEQ9dQ>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 16:09:58 -0000

Hi all,

draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis incudes an "Obsoletes" header but the abstract text indicates the draft updates RFC 6145.  

Given the list of documents that reference RFC6145 (see the list in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6145/referencedby/) wouldn't just be OK if this document focuses on UPDATES to RFC6145 rather than obsoleting it.

Cheers,
Med

> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von fred@cisco.com
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. November 2015 20:00
> An: v6ops@ietf.org
> Betreff: [v6ops] draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis WGLC
> 
> This is to initiate a two week working group last call of
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis.
> Please read it now. If you find nits (spelling errors, minor suggested
> wording changes, etc), comment to the authors; if you find greater issues,
> such as disagreeing with a statement or finding additional issues that
> need to be addressed, please post your comments to the list.
> 
> We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the document
> as well as its content. If you have read the document and believe it to be
> of operational utility, that is also an important comment to make.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email