Re: [v6ops] draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis WGLC

[David Farmer <[e-mail]>]

I echo the three nits below from Brian that don't seem to have been 
addressed.

I'll add the acknowledgements section alludes to the changes by thanking 
people for some of them, while that it good, its not sufficient. 
Without a summary of the changes it was difficult to review the document 
properly.

Thanks.

On 7/4/15 15:23 , Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> There are nits:
>
>> This document updates RFC 6145.
>
> Surely that should be "obsoletes" (if not, it isn't a "bis" document).
>
> IMHO, unless you have explicit permission from the author of RFC 2765,
> you still need the <rfc ipr="pre5378Trust200902"> boilerplate.
>
> A short "Changes from RFC6145" appendix would be useful.
>
> Regards
>    Brian

On 11/29/15 13:00 , [e-mail] wrote:
> This is to initiate a two week working group last call of
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis.
> Please read it now. If you find nits (spelling errors, minor suggested
> wording changes, etc), comment to the authors; if you find greater
> issues, such as disagreeing with a statement or finding additional
> issues that need to be addressed, please post your comments to the
> list.
>
> We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the
> document as well as its content. If you have read the document and
> believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important
> comment to make.
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>


-- 
================================================
David Farmer               Email: [e-mail]
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE     Phone: [phone]
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029  Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================